hey baker - noticed you included >>2085305 and then removed it from notables. did you change your mind? please explain decision
<we still have not even determined what "the ultimate question" is
I AGREE - but this is what we could be discussing if anons hadn't slid those questions into oblivion
look at this highly relevant post from a previous thread
all im saying is that the anons questions could have led to productive discussion. if you look at lb you will see a lot of anons calling me a fag etc for wanting to discuss good questions relating to a q crumb…
HMMM, good question. lets discuss it…
so as the anon from many threads ago asked )paraphrasing_ what is missing? i think anon was suggesting it was us that was missing from the equation as in a reporter should be asking us about "the ultimate question" non potus (as he stays out of it for optics as has been mentioned)…