>>2085969 (lb)

>why do you think such questions do not bear discussing?

Not quite the case. 1, on the lookout for those trying to derail, sometimes friendly fire happens, been hit with plenty, doesn't hurt after a while. 2, I just don't see it as notable. Why? Cart being put before the horse. I'm of the mind that we still have not even determined what "the ultimate question" is, let alone who should be asking it and when is best to ask, etc.

(Hint: Who is Q is not bound to get a straight answer that leads to a positive reaction from MSM once asked).

Regardless to anons' enthusiasm, I'm still not convinced that we've answered the question.

I've also considered that the question was more for the MSM lurkers, than for anons, who have ALREADY been pushing Q & Q drops into normiesphere. What do we need to do differently if it IS for us to do? Also, the WE who have to 'force', could be Q team and not us at all.

Once we determine what the ULTIMATE question is (the question that actually brings an end to some unknown that is soon to be made public), that, IMO, makes a notable, real horsepower.

Disclaimer: I could be wrong. And I never mind being wrong, as long as i'm honest.

>>2086010

>40,000 km view is classified.

<We have reached our cruising altitude of 40,000 ft. long ago.

<As we prepare to land, please fasten your seatbelt and make sure your seat back and folding trays are in their full upright position.

So declassification = landing?

<Already written?

>>2086219

I've brought it up a few times only for it to be overlooked (shrugs), once consensus sets in, anons tend not to expand thinking beyond it. Once "Who is Q?" got legs, it kept running, very few want to even reconsider it.

Seems many want to be right, rather than wanting to get it right. Just an observation. If i seemed jaded last bread, that would be why.

Q didn't say "We are waiting for a reporter to ask the question", Q specified ULTIMATE question. For this anon, that makes a huge difference.

>>2086432

Keep thinking along this line. You may be closer than you think.

>How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?

POTUS has been consistently right, long before announcing that he was running for office. HOW? The may ULTIMATE ? may be more along the lines of

>How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?

>Who is helping POTUS?

>>2086659

Yes, these are great questions. However, are they being asked rhetorically, or are you seeking answers? Answers to these questions would be notable. The questions alone aren't.

and, repeating the questions bread to bread to 'force' the conversation, make the one who's asking these questions, questionable