>>20860148
he is pretty
tarded bigly
think logically
jim does allow pedo posting here due to the sites mere existence
ergo: you are a certified idiot
>>20860148
would
I aint fussy
>8ch had the pedo rep
yes it did
jim watkins tries to whitewash his past but the truth is many of his past websites allowed kiddy porn and he ran actual porno websites for the japanese sickos
*I expect this post to be deleted because it tells the truth
send the judges a sternly worded email that will fix it