>between both buildings
>WTC buildings in only 45 minutes
Regarding 911 and telling normies about it, focuse on WTC 7 building falling with freefall speed.
Consider everything else about 911 secondary to WTC 7. It is the one undeniable evidence of an inside job, and which triggers eye opening with lots of people.
…and use this video to do it. (or a shorter version I couldn´t find in a hurry)
Yes, but it´s the freefall speed of WTC7 building that is the smoking gun. Lots of other issues to look into, but this one is the main one. You can´t have freefall speed unless there is nothing standing in the way, i.e. the support beams have been taken down. There is no other explanation available, and it´s the most obvious evidence of an inside job.
>wtc is slide
>welcome to 2024
kek
the shills don´t like us talking about 911
idiots
filturd
>>20864423 me
>be announced 20 minutes too early on the BBC, nice guess.
>for it to be notable
well, it´s common knowledge among most of anons, I would think.
WTC 7 freefall collapse speed is what has awaken more people than any other I know of, because it´s undeniable.
It´s ancient history, but sure, bakes can gather this bun for a 911 reminder.
>Thermite would clear that bridge in a short while
There are no doubts about the thermite, just look at the architect&engineer documentary above. I was just pointing out the main thing to focus on regarding 911 for new eyes.
>IF you really want to test free fall speed
no need, it´s been done, just posted a clip above of the collapse, and the documentary above goes into details.
>You cannot assert that building 7 had thermite in it,
ok, so what else can take a building down like that. the documentary above goes into all of this.
…and it was planted before 911 obviously, yoiu don´t rig a collapse like that in a day.
also, wtc 7 was a high security building, offices of ABCs and SS and more. No way to plant bombs in there without it being an inside job.
blablabla
the only thing you´re doing is making anons ask why you shills are pushing this.
Can you tell us?
>give me a link to some research you posted in your 15 posts this bread?
oh, the shill is angy kek
actually posted this video above, no problem posting it again, just for you
-
It´s not going to happen.
-
It´s already been done, see documentary.
-
Watch the documentary before you speak again.
GM Fren
>My work get researched and investigated
Good.
I don´t see any need for bridge/thermite investigation to learn what we already know (see documentary), and wonder why this issue is pushed with such emphasis.
I´m not the baker, I don´t decide what´s notable or not. If any 911-reminder would be notable then WTC 7 freefall collapse speed is what makes it notable.
they´re talking about it around here, I quickly search for it, not exact timestamp
(doesn´t embed with timestamp)
https://youtu.be/TXIltUQdg6I?t=5682
and I have nothing against doing whatever you´re suggesting to do at the bridge
just saying it´s not going to add anything to the 911 issue that hasn´t already been talked about
they are here for the newfags who don´t know any better
they know they don´t stand a chance with oldfags
the only reason to call them out instead of filtering is for the newfags
filturd
>Filtering is for the weakminded.
oh well…
I filter when I´m taking a break from calling them out
>It can show many things including how the bridge was taken out.
Yeah, I´m all for checking everything out regarding the bridge. Just saying the thermite 911-question has already been answered thoroughly…
o7