If anon 'members correctly…
"UP is DOWN, LEFT is RIGHT" or somethink.
So try this, flip the img to get the MIRROR, then flip the mirror & what'ch got?
ANS: a f'n really wierdass piccy, but dat's chucky right? in an ALL read piccy.
Comms is comms, right?
21guns = something ded? / died?
add in some: 17th @ 10:00am add "indy" add "Castle" add 11:30am add lotsa flags add "tallship" add a "tugboat" add 11:37 post and…
forget it, move along nothing to see 'ere, anon has been looking at to many titty pics & is a mental retard anyhow, move along…
>“While taxiing, its winglet contacted a parked and unoccupied corporate jet,” the FAA said. “The incident occurred in an area of the airport where the FAA does not direct aircraft. The FAA is investigating.”
>A winglet is a short fin that projects upward from the wing of an aircraft. They are used to reduce aerodynamic drag.
a BS story. as says a WINGLET is an UPWARDS pointing extention to a BIG planes wing. How da fook could it hit an eeny-weeny tiny low level corp jet?
>Pareidolia
Yea heard that one, per wiki it's where I see something (YOU) can NOT, or refuse to, or nuffinburger right?
>learns pareidolia from wiki…
>the absolute state of humanity.
absolutely. humanity is upside down, inverted & totally fucked. So 'wiki' as a "sauce" is prob as anti-info / actually as anything. a benchmark none the less. Prob less better than getting brainfood from a nutty proffessor at a uni with a lifetime debt who sells own books to confirm he is the oracle. if professors were any good at anything the would do good sh!t rather than taking kids $$$ via books/loans in exchange for mind f'cking kids with PROPOGANDA.
what the actual F is a "source" anyhow?
simple: "reality is 90% perception" it's what ever YOU think it might be. wiki just makes a fairly consistant benchmark in BS
>Wikipedia…is not a source per say
Agree, I said it was a "benchmark" of "info". Usually has lotsa dig worth links as you say, even if the info has / does get twisted. and it's easier than looking up Britannica or world almanac etc. the INTENT, originally of wiki was same as HTML, ie a "user" can add/create/ distribute info & add "comments" etc. sadly for wiki (& html) those "additions'/edits" usually have bias & a lot of msm style 'tweaks"/political input in interpretation. aka propoganda. but as you say still a starting point. sorta same-same as msm