>>20874569 (pb)

>>20874706 (pb)

>Why would I not?

Anon has no interest in divisionfagging and shall therefore not expound too much on why anon does not.

Anon will simply state that anon has been here since Feb 18 and has seen many practices implemented by current (and let's not even talk about Slackjack) admin which anon strongly opposes and any attempt at discussions with them on the subject are quickly curtailed and rebuffed along with deletion of said attempts. Legitimate criticism of current admin practices is strictly verboten and decried as shilling.

Furthermore, anon has seen some very sketchy behaviour from said admin.

And, just for clarification, anon does not post muh joo rubbish or other shillery and filters said posts on sight.

>>20874984

>I will enforce the Missouri Human Rights Act to ensure Missourians are not targeted for their free exercise of religion.

Does that include Satanism?

>>20875204

>you have not created a new board nor claimed one that has gone fallow so you can be a Board Owner yourself

Le sigh, anon should have expected the standard response. Anon came to the board because of Q and stayed here because it is where Q has posted and, who knows, may post again.

Anon has zero desire desire to create a competing board as other faggots have done in an effort to divide the community.

Try another tack, Jack!

>>20875225

>What part of freedom of religion do you not understand?

And herein lies the crux of the matter.

Satanists are known to perform ritual sacrifices which are counter the law.

Do we just ignore that due to muh freedom of religion?