>>2087613

>>2087620

Been here since the half chan migration and within the past few days, and the last 2 overnight shifts, I can never recall seeing this much gay porn shilling.

That's by far their most desperate move to date.

What they don't realize is that we're all trained at watching porns and being able to mentally block out the random dude/cock in the video… so their gay porn onslaughts were no big deal… I let my eyes lose focus for the 2 seconds it takes me to filter their homo asses.

We are winning!

Good week ahead!

o7

>>2087952

There are a few of us other anons that liked the article too… we were drilled hard for discussing it. I agree overall tho. It's the first write up about Q that absolutely dispels the notion that he's a LARP.

Maybe it's just a coincidence but since that article dropped, we've had the catalog brought down twice and more gay porn shilling then I have ever witnessed here.

I found incredibly positive results when sending that article out to normies. I think the piece was intended to wake up normies, let them know that

Trump supports what we do here, make it so Q can't be doxxed (because we are all Q), and even taunts the enemy a bit.

Although there were some inaccuracies, I felt them to be so blatant that they were intended that way for normie consumption.

Who knows… but yes, some anons agree with you.

>>2088023

^^^^THIS

The moment leaf goes 3 breads without a (You) will be the same moment he kys. Stop feeding leaf.

>>2088092

You're welcome… there's a few more of us floating around too… We had a great discussion going on that article two nights ago, when we were getting lambasted by gay porn.

We noted how the article still gave credit to 8ch but scared newfags away from trying to find the board. Noted why it would have been wise to use some normie terms instead of the 8ch lingo. Noted how the article seemed to strategically use some quasi-disinfo but it was in our favor.

Not sure why all the other anons got so upset by the article but I pretty much gave up talking about it. I think some anons are too autistsy to understand the importance of the normiefying of the article and that's fine because it wasn't written for them.

When anons started attacking the author, I did some digging and actually found the guy to be a patriot. He's the one that called out that other Breitbart reporter that claimed she was assaulted by Trump's staff during the campaign. He's stuck his neck out a ton for Trump. And the BLP page seemed in line with everything we say here.. people were calling it anti-trump and it couldn't be any further from the truth…. so it made me question why?

>>2088187

It said Trump communicates with Q anons…. does that sound like just a buncha anons?

WE ARE ALL Q… that's the point. By saying that, it makes it impossible to doxx Q and offers Trump the plausible deniability he needs.

I realize this is some 4d chess here anon but do try to keep up.

>>2088230

I actually thought you looked kinda hot in your pic… don't listen to that faggot.

>>2088201

I don't think the board is comped but it's obviously under attack… but that's not new.

Agreed with everything you said. There's too many good points in your post here so don't expect the same amount of shilling on it. They don't want to give it the (You)s…

and your best bet is just not responding to the negative ones. I was banned yesterday for the BLP article too and have all but left the topic alone since they removed my ban due to my appeal.

Maybe when the catalog starts working again, we make a separate thread on it so people don't keep calling it a slide.

>>2088262

Exactly anon… you hit the nail on the head. Thx for speaking up. It was just strange how that article was received more negatively than the NYtimes piece or the Snopes debunking piece…. didn't make any sense. There was def some shilling involved with the bashing of that and many anons got carried away with the tide.