>>20879963 pb
isn't "famous anon" an oxymoron?
>>20879963 pb
isn't "famous anon" an oxymoron?
>>20879963 pb
isn't "famous anon" an oxymoron?
Shouldn't it say "previous Anon"?
"ANTIFA jerk doxed a Right-wing historian academic?"
You can only be doxed if you are anonymous? right?
And someone breaks your anonymity.
So "doxed an anon" is redundant?
I guess Batman is a famous anon.
kekek
But what was the doxed academic's handler I forget?
Lopez.
How famous was Lopez?
Never heard of him.
Think of this:
Q+ identifies with Batman.
Why has no one "asked the question" and Doxed Q+ = when it's right out in the open?
Isn't there some Q" drops which related to this question?
But what was the doxed academic's handle I forget?
"Lopez"?
How famous was Lopez?
Never heard of him.
ANTIFA had to really scrape for that. They were tagging him for some reason.
How many followers on Twit did he even have? Or where were his accounts?
It was a good interview on Bannon, though.
Interesting, clash of cultures? - dude comes out of the crucible of Left Academia; kek
He somehow survived. kekke
"Jonathan Keeperman Details His Triggering Of 'The Guardian' "
https://rumble.com/embed/v4swqqi/?pub=4
Bannon brings out the point that the Guardian went hysterical on the guy, and why?
Pages and pages; they were stalking him. keke
He triggered 'em.
And who ever heard of "Lopez"
It's not well-known.
The Lady from Virgin Isles who has a seat in the House (?) does she really watch Bannon?
kekkkkkekk
dream on