Bibliotecapleyades is not good sauce. It's a hint about what to look for. But almost none of it is backed by reliable evidence.
That stuff could be the dark musing of some science fiction writer or the the delusions of a schizophrenic, for all we know.
This isn't the place of it. We don't want it.
You keep posting this and are wondering why it's not gaining any traction.
The problem is that the article does not include sauce to support its assertions. There was a big kaboom and two people died. That sounds like some real bad luck. But how do we know they were about to testify before a grand jury and implicate the Clinton Foundation? Grand jury proceedings are secret. There is now way this "journalist" could have known that.
It is this is the gap in the sauce for which the anons and autists are rejecting the article. It smells like bait./
Sorry. I assumed you were that same guy posting this for the past 4 breads.
8ch.net/qresearch/index.html