Anonymous ID: 1cff9c July 8, 2018, 11:03 p.m. No.2089241   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2089162

I fully support trying it out. But we shouldn't expect either to be panacea.

Most of the banter is shills deliberately crapping up the bread and people responding to them. The shills are not going to cooperate with efforts to reduce their effectiveness. And responses are inevitable, both from anons who fall for the bait and anons who know it's bait but feel the need to publicly refute it so that lesser minds don't succumb.

It worth a shot. But have reasonable expectations.

Anonymous ID: 1cff9c July 9, 2018, 12:44 a.m. No.2090032   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2089990

It should just be called "Chat" or something. A newfag doesn't know what "Bantz" means.

I have this thread and bantz open on two monitors. I am watching them at the same timeโ€ฆ All the shills are right here.