Shambles
that's a great word.
here is a great headline:
"Alvin Bragg's Case in Shambles After Michael Cohen Admits to Stealing From Trump and More"
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2024/05/20/michael-cohen-admits-on-the-witness-stand-to-stealing-money-from-trump-as-case-gets-more-absurd-n2174413
you're the main man here now that Q is in hiatus.
it used to be that most people here didn't even know who you are.
be well in every way possible!
shambles, man, shambles.
Michael Cohen shambled into the court room to admit yet more thievery . . .
Wait, I mean 'ambled'.
yes, it does. But it's not a burger, it's a rendering of a burger and you were never supposed to eat it but just look at it.
The Proto images are all too vivid and too shiney to be real. My advice is that Jim ought to learn a bit more about texture modeling and how to do the lighting. I've been studying blender for a long time to learn these things, and AI images are essentially doing the same thing. To make something seem real one needs to know about how light interacts with various surfaces and model the ray-tracing accordingly. I think the purpose of what Jim does is not to decieve so he makes the proto out to be an obviously cartoony image in order to assure that no one with good eyesight would confuse it for an actual photograph.
if Jim is still in the bread you could ask him yourself. I think what he hasn't isn't bad given what it's said to be.
another anon has commented on your proto renderings as being not-photo-real. (actually he said he wouldn't eat that burger)
is that an intentional feature of proto renderings so that they are never confused with actual photographs and so not useful for deception?
it is branded within the image as a proto image.
Jim has presented a proto AI tool for use in making renderings of various stuff for the use of the world at large.
and they images are never photo-real.
he's still in the bread. you should query him directly.
someone asked about what is your image supposed to be.
Do you use blender? you might consider trying it out. It's got a steep learning curve but the output is amazing.
if I put it on do I become invisible to everyone except for Ring Wraiths?
Is this post disrespecting the dead?
maybe they escaped and faked their death, like it was said Nero did. and many others.
Charisms of the Holy Spirit are for sharing!
>(You)
huh.
because there is very much disagreement about end times accross very many denominations of Christians but all agree that it isn't anything to fight about.
it's OK to disagree and it's not 'clear' that it is endtimes now.
in fact it does seem, and I've noticed, that every single generation has some group or faction claiming it's end times.
and it is for them, perhaps. They all suicide (comet hale bop, for example, when that happened)
but other times they wait on the mountaintop, sure that Jesus Christ will come for them then, and nothing happened (Methodists in New York State in the 1800s)
no, it is untrue that 'clearly this is the end'
Christian scripture says a lot about the second coming of Christ. The interpretation of that accross very many different groups of Christians is often in dispute. Protestants have a bunch of different theories about it what it all means.
some say Christ already came back, others that He hasn't yet. Some say a milenium is def just a 1000 years. others say that it's a 'span of time over centuries' but not a definite duration.
And as far as it goes, the discussion of it is copious. I can't parrot out what I've learned about these disagreements except to say that eveyrone who disagrees about these matters still agrees : Jesus Christ is Lord!
and that, too them, is the most important thing to agree on.
and thus the discussion of 'millennialism' might be seen as a slide, and all it's different versions.
you don't control the gates of Heaven, nor do you decide who goes there so as far as your fishing for an argument goes: believe what you want. Explain it to Christ.
what I think of it, in terms of your salvation, is of no accord.
and that's that.
we don't have to agree about the phrases and terms, anon.
and maybe we both meet in Heaven.
it's not up to me or you.
Peace out!
when someone quibbles over terms, anon, it's something that tells me that you are wanting discord.
and that shows me what you are growing, what 'fruit' if you will, that you desire.
and thus it is said (and you know by Who) 'by their fruits you will know them.
of course I could come wrong, that's always the case when dealign with strangers in discourse.
but one thing I don't want to do is deal with a stranger who wants discord.
so if your discourse is to have discord, then try your tactics on someone else.
be well.