If you look at the executive orders I have linked to this post, add the increased provisions, personnel, and the new judge recently appointed to Guantánamo Bay, what’s happening in Haiti, this election fiasco, all the other things we’ve watched happening under the MSM radar and this particular conversation between senator Graham and justice Kavanaugh during the confirmation hearings, you will see why they put up such a fight against Kavanaugh, why they are panicking now and most of all, that what is happening right now is the strategic final placement of the pieces on the game board. For those in doubt, you aren’t really paying attention are you?
GRAHAM: Let’s talk about the law in war. Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict?
KAVANAUGH: There is — there is such a body, Senator.
GRAHAM: Is there a body of law that’s called the basic criminal law?
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
GRAHAM: Are there differences between those two bodies of law?
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
GRAHAM: From an American citizen’s point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you? If you’re in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?
KAVANAUGH: From your own government, yes.
GRAHAM: OK. So if you’re in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?
KAVANAUGH: If you’re an American in Afghanistan, you have constitutional rights against the U.S. government.
GRAHAM: Is there a long-standing…
KAVANAUGH: That’s — that’s long-settled law.
GRAHAM: Isn’t there also a long-settled law that — it goes back to Eisentrager case, I can’t remember the name of it.
KAVANAUGH: Yes, Johnson vs. Eisentrager.
GRAHAM: Right — that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have considered enemy combatants?
KAVANAUGH: They can be.
GRAHAM: Can be.
KAVANAUGH: They can be. They’re often — some — they’re sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military sense.
GRAHAM: Well let’s talk about can be. I think the …
KAVANAUGH: Under a Supreme Court precedent …
GRAHAM: Right.
KAVANAUGH: Just want to make — yeah.
GRAHAM: There’s a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is that correct?
KAVANAUGH: That is correct.
GRAHAM: I think a couple of them were executed.
KAVANAUGH: Yeah.
GRAHAM: So if anybody doubts there’s a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don’t have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and collaborate with the enemy of the nation.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/03/08/2018-04860/2018-amendments-to-the-manual-for-courts-martial-united-states
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/02/02/2018-02261/protecting-america-through-lawful-detention-of-terrorists
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/08/2018-00240/termination-of-presidential-advisory-commission-on-election-integrity
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/06/01/2018-11939/promoting-accountability-and-streamlining-removal-procedures-consistent-with-merit-system-principles
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/13/2018-15195/establishing-an-exception-to-competitive-examining-rules-for-appointment-to-certain-positions-in-the
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/13/2018-15202/excepting-administrative-law-judges-from-the-competitive-service
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/08/07/2018-17068/reimposing-certain-sanctions-with-respect-to-iran
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/21/2018-20816/authorizing-the-implementation-of-certain-sanctions-set-forth-in-the-countering-americas-adversaries