Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:28 p.m. No.2089477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9516

>>2089439

see here’s my problem

Q has stated the administration needs to appear neutral right?

so if they ask the question.. sarah has to give some “we can neither confirm nor deny” type answer and move on

which can be used against us

i feel like Q was kinda trolling when he said were waiting for a reporter to ask..

like obviously they’re not going

even people like hannity and cernovich

 

UNTIL Q MOVEMENT REACHES MASS AUDIENCES in which case they have no choice but to ask

 

Q has to go viral first imo

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:31 p.m. No.2089503   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9606 >>4640

>>2089463

IVE LITERALLY BEEN SAYING THIS

 

this is a test

he posts that sketchy stock image thing to test our loyalty

the next day this article drops

the same day that happens the catalog freezes and shills and porn bots come out in droves ON A NIGHT SHIFT

like something is fishy..

 

also i follow lots of Q supporters with tons of followers on twitter and none of them have posted the article

 

how did the OP even find it? it’s gotten such little publicity and it was posted the same day it was published

and from what i remember there were no other posts in that bread by that ID

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:34 p.m. No.2089524   🗄️.is 🔗kun

it’s so annoying phonefagging

i can’t believe i’ve been posting for less than 2 weeks and already got banned lolll

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:36 p.m. No.2089542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9570

>>2089516

oh true you’re right he did say they could end it by asking POTUS

 

but what about the “POTUS will not comment for optics” thing Q said back in november?

 

ugh disinformation is real but how do we know what’s disinformation 😐

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:43 p.m. No.2089615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9648

>>2089512

not to mention the stuff about Q being in coffee shops was purely metaphorical/figurative language

remember the style of the article was “interview” not straight up facts

like a rolling stone profile type crap

obviously it could’ve been better written but it was entertaining which is why it has such great potential for redpilling

it gets people asking questions

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:44 p.m. No.2089631   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9680

>>2089591

lmao yes 😅

because i was literally being bombarded with (you)s!! why else would i have so many posts! then attacking me so hard over it made me convinced i/we were ott!

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 8, 2018, 11:48 p.m. No.2089660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9714

THIS IS AN INFORMATION WAR

 

i know i’m overly passionate but i have a great sense of intuition and i trust my gut about this article

anons need to do the same instead of ~following the leader~

is it a coincidence BO banned both people who were supporting it? i really really hope so bc that’s the last thing we need

 

ps anon who was also banned how do you appeal a ban? how long was yours? mine is two weeks..

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 9, 2018, 12:05 a.m. No.2089794   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9843

can i just say how much i love you all and grateful i am that this movement has brought together so many intelligent, likeminded, (mostly) awake people? <3

 

before this article fuckery, i was a spirituality/pleidian(sp?) anon and it’s very rare that spiritual types actually give a fuck about what’s going on in the world

both need to redpill each other imo

Anonymous ID: 946a0e July 9, 2018, 12:16 a.m. No.2089859   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9890 >>9920

>>2089843

lol yea i’m the article fag who doxxed herself and i have no shame about it

although i’m slightly scared because 2 shills referred to me as “she” many breads ago when i was defending the article and i am usually pretty androgynous here..

but yes, i have 2 x chromosomes

i am sure there are many of us on here, we’re just (usually) good at hiding it