dChan
Anonymous ID: ce5c50 May 21, 2024, 1:30 p.m. No.20896866   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20896759

>According to CSIS, any opposition to LGBT ideology constitutes an Ideologically Motivated Violent Extremism (IMVE) movement that poses a "significant threat to Canada's national security."

what a bunch of faggots

Anonymous ID: ce5c50 May 21, 2024, 1:42 p.m. No.20896931   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6999

In an April talk at the University of Toronto, Trudeau said he never forced anyone to get a COVID-19 vaccine. “While not forcing anyone to get vaccinated, I chose to make sure that all the incentives and all of the protections were there to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated,” he told the crowd.

The claim is technically correct in that Trudeau never personally held someone down and jabbed a syringe into them. But it fails on many of the conventional definitions of “force.”

By pandemic’s end, unvaccinated status was sufficient to get you fired from a federally regulated industry, barred from most forms of transportation and severely restricted in your ability to exit and re-enter the country.

 

Shortly after the Emergencies Act was invoked in early 2022 to clear entrenched Freedom Convoy blockades in Ottawa, Trudeau stood up in the House of Commons to say that he’d done it primarily because police had been asking for it. “We have heard from the commissioner of the RCMP, police chiefs, experts and political leadership that it was essential to the police response, and that it offered precision and clarity as they did their important work,” he said on March 1, 2022.

One of the first major discoveries of the Emergencies Act Inquiry, however, was that no police force had asked for the Emergencies Act. This is particularly true of then RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, the only specific individual named in Trudeau’s House of Commons statement.

Correspondence tabled before the commission would find that Lucki had raised doubts about the act being invoked, saying that law enforcement hadn’t yet expended “all available tools” in clearing the blockades.

 

In May, an unnamed source within CSIS leaked to the Globe and Mail that, two years prior, they had uncovered information indicating that Conservative MP Michael Chong appeared to be the focus of targeted harassment by the People’s Republic of China. Despite the CSIS source saying that they’d compiled these findings into a report, so little was done about it that nobody had even bothered to tell Chong.

Trudeau’s immediate reaction was that he hadn’t heard about the Chong allegations because CSIS had never told him. The intelligence agency “made the determination that it wasn’t something that needed to be raised to a higher level because it wasn’t a significant enough concern,” Trudeau told a scrum of reporters.

But it took mere hours until this account was contradicted by Trudeau’s own national security adviser, Jody Thomas. In a phone call, Thomas told Chong that there was indeed a CSIS report about him written in July, 2021, and that it had been sent not only to her office, but also several cabinet offices and the Privy Council Office – which works directly with the prime minister.