At the risk of being called a shill (which I'm not, unless this bread was baked by a shill baker),

I have to say we need to dig more into the four recent "discrepancies" in the Q posts. I think that

Q had a purpose to the probably-faked-AF1 photo, but I'm not sure what it is.

My guess - and that's all it is, a guess - is that we're about to get "professional" audio-video guys

telling us that the audio and video evidence against the cabal are fake. We've been seeing

inklings of the set up to this all over the media, which I've documented in some of the notables

recently. Anyway, we need to hone our skills to counter these accusations of "fake video," by learning

how to absolutely prove true from fake. So, are Q's recent fakes? I think "Maybe," so Autist Anons need

to figure how to fucking spot them and how to PROVE real from fake.

>>2090977

I have no fucking clue who serialbrain is, and I don't even read namefag's posts, so that's a non-starter. If SB had something to say, then give me a synopsis. If SB said it elsewhere, give me a link.

>>2090987

When did I say, "We need to dig?" I'll wait while you look.

I'm trying to get some consensus on this board that we need to examine the Q pics. Every

time I've seen it brought up, all I see are calls of "Shill!" and similar. A closed mind gathers

no information, and I've seen nothing but closed minds here when it comes to honestly

examining Q's recent picture posts.

>>2090999

>“protect … breast-feeding”

Uh-huh. What, exactly does this entail? I think "More government." On this portion alone, I'm

against the measure. I wouldn't trust the UN to mandate the sun coming up in the East without

accumulating more wealth or power to itself.