When you see narrative that to criticize one man is necessarily and you see a tacit accusation that everyone could be driven only by collective anti-group motivation as to why they are speaking about that one man, is itself anti-group.
Imagine criticism of pedophile sex trafficker Epstein was replied to by a voice that to speak that that is to somehow constitute a criticism of an unrelated number of people because of some other unrelated group predicate naming conventions labels to effectively say "isolate/extract people into these people but not everyone else, divided to start by different names."
As if to stop one man from trafficking children is to want to stop the existences of 17 million people?
That is a human sheild logic to protect criminals.
To label justice for one man as if unfairly targeting hostility to millions.
Who is really associating the bad behavior to semites? The voice speaking individual people's names, or the voices claiming a link between the two using any logic gate path whatsoever?