Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 6:36 a.m. No.20917537   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7628 >>7672 >>7722 >>7738 >>7967

>>20916502 (LB)

>I’m not understanding all this excitement about librarians. Nor does it make ANY sense that they have national gatherings

The 'excitement' is that anons, and both libertarians and maga, are noticing a large partial philosophical alignment that some have noticed a long time ago (many current maga started as ron paul followers), but now with the 'overt' endorsement, A COMMON ENEMY IS CENTRAL BANKING, and in case you have been living under a rock since at least 2008, the best central bank critics are intellectually within the libertarian sphere.

This is genius tier strategizing. ANY political movement that is intending to demolish the deep state, and its central bank hegemony ("there is no second place"), is going to need a philosophical/intellectual infrastructure to serve as the 'mind' justification to reflectively support and drive the 'body' praxis of demoloshing the 5th plank of the communist manifesto once and for all.

With the libertarian party and maga unified, the greatest political movement in world history now has the world's TOP academic "end the fed" movement in world history.

Nobody holds a candle to the libertarians for the WHY behind "end the fed". It has Ron Paul, it has the Austrian School, it has what maga needs to combine forces to take down the final tri side of "the eye", the Rothschild cult of fiat currencies controlling governments as a proxy to control populations.

This could not have gone any better, it is literally the smartest move.

And one really nice accicent of history, is that all the anti maga projection scam artists can't smear "end the fed" as anti-semitic, because the Austrian School is filled with jews, like Mises, Rothbard, Reisman, so maga is going to have jewish intellectuals as the intellectual engine to criticize and demolish the Rothschild fiat cult.

The deep state cannot claim the demolition is anti-semitic.

Maga is now equipped, armed, locked and fully loaded to dismantle the final tri side of "the eye".

 

How can you NOT be excited about this?

 

MAGA NATIONAL UNITY + PHILOSOPHICAL/ECONOMIC LIBERTARIANISM = BIGGEST NIGHTMARE FOR CENTRAL BANKING (5TH PLANK OF COMMUNIST MANIFESTO)

Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 7:10 a.m. No.20917657   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20917628

Yes, MAGA will help expose and purge the LINOs from the Libertarian Party and the Libertarian Party will help expose and purge the RINOs from MAGA.

A mutually beneficial reciprocal cleansing and sharpening.

 

Common enemy is Marxism. Central banking is the 5th plank in Communist Manifesto.

Truth of the world is that we are living under economic Marxism.

There is no better academic source of demolishing economic Marxism than from within the Libertarian tradition.

Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 7:26 a.m. No.20917699   🗄️.is 🔗kun

In case anyone wants to know how to best demolish Marxism in as succinct a way possible, in a single idea, it is this:

 

The first, original, primary form of monetary income humanity started with, both logically and temporally/historically, is PROFIT income, not wage income. In the "early and rude state of society", if there ever was such a time, the sale by the first income earners, for selling pottery bowls or animal skins were all product sales revenues, they were earnings on the sale of goods, not labor, not wages. And because those sellers were self sufficient producers they incurred no monetary costs of goods sold, straight from the Earth they made goods that earned product sales revenues on zero monetary costs. Product Sales Revenues MINUS zero monetary costs of goods sold is PROFIT income, not wage income.

 

It wasn't until self-sufficient producers started PAYING FOR LABOR, did wage income arise. Capitalism in fact converted a world that was only profit income, into a world where profit income declined and wage income arose. Capitalism is in fact a creation of wages, NOT a 'deduction from wages'.

 

The inner core, the kernel, of Marx's entire worldview rests on the false assumption that wage income came first and then greedy capitalists came along and started to deduct from wages and convert wages into profit. The truth of the world is literally the exact opposite of what Marx and thereby his followers claimed in writing and speech.

 

The truth is that Marx's railings against capitalists for deducting from wages, exploiting wage earners, to 'extract' profit from those wages, is the opposite of what is actually happening. The truth is that wage incomes are deductions from what otherwise would be all profit income. Capitalist activity is in fact the onset and creator of wage income.

Truth is if wage earners want more wage income, they should want more capitalist activity, not less.

 

With this single idea made explicit, the entirety of Marxism collapses at its inner monetary core.

Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 8:20 a.m. No.20917899   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7906

>>20917722

>They are idealists

Not fully, they're primarily logicians, which is 'idealist', but the PRAXEOLOGICAL SCHOOL within the libertarian movement bridges the gap between mind and action.

 

Ending the Fed isnt something that can be labelled as only workable on paper.

Free enterprise isnt something that can be labelled as only workable on paper.

 

MAGA needs an idealist component that isn't ONLY nationalist. Otherwise any solution to the problem of central banking will itself be another nationalist monetary system.

 

Ending the Fed won't work in real life

Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 8:22 a.m. No.20917906   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20917899

Cont'd, got cut off in error, posted too soon

 

Ending the Fed won't work in real life…without an intellectual source that speaks the same language as Marxism while exposing its flaws

Anonymous ID: 0abc7f May 26, 2024, 9:59 a.m. No.20918193   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8203

Come on cult, it's not as if MAGA and Libertarian Party are identical.

If there weren't also a few people booing (most were cheering) that would have been concerning because it would have showed there are no purists within the party.

Good parties always have purists.