dChan
Anonymous ID: c65396 July 9, 2018, 9:35 a.m. No.2092714   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2733 >>2754 >>3079 >>3392 >>3430

I guess it's obvious by now, but I finally figured out what Q meant with this post.

 

Now remember that when he made this post originally, it was when we thought actions were going to take place in America that ended up occurring in Saudi Arabia (look behind you).

 

So, think Mirror.

On July 4th, who won their independence and from which country?

The USA did, from the UK (but, look behind you).

Think Mirror.

Who is going to get the freedom this July 4 (approximate)?

Who is the drop referring to?

 

The UK.

 

Q was telling us to have eyes on the UK.

Like I said it's probably obvious by now.

 

#ItsComingHome

Anonymous ID: c65396 July 9, 2018, 9:43 a.m. No.2092774   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2888

>>2092754

Huge News

Pretty sure he was controlled opposition anyways.

Resigning just like our corrupt politicians here in the USA because he has so much dirt that he has no choice but to disappear.

 

Might even be an indictment with his name on it.

We'll see; is my theory right, or just a fanciful story.

 

The important part is that the UK government is now been shaken up - Patriots are in control.

 

#ItsComingHome

The Revolution

Anonymous ID: c65396 July 9, 2018, 9:56 a.m. No.2092862   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3021

>>2092842

Alright, I concede.

Then I guess my counterpoint would be:

It's impossible to use logic properly in situations where you don't have all the information.

Like now, in relation to happenings.

What's that called? "Leaps in logic"? That's a big no-no right?

 

But if I relied on logic for everything I wouldn't even be here.

Leaps in logic led me to here. Filling in blanks, etc.

Anyways this discussion is getting long, I understand your point.

Anonymous ID: c65396 July 9, 2018, 10:19 a.m. No.2093086   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3317

>>2093021

Kek, I'm not talking about belief or faith.

I'm simply talking about how does one get from point A to point C without point B?

How do you do it?

How can you route a logical path from beginning to conclusion without the relevant intermediate data points?

Can it be done?

Or do you have to make guesses and 'leaps'?

That was my main point/question/observation.

 

So when someone says "use logic" but doesn't give a scaffolding on which to use it, people will end up having to construct their own scaffolding.

Especially nowadays when everything is a lie.

And even some of the drops we get here are lies (necessary disinfo).

 

Whoever has the most information has the power.

But i still get your point, and agree with it.