Pretty sure Q was telling us to take the time to go back over past crumbs and solidify our understanding of what is about to happen. I can probably count on both hands and feet, the amount of anons that are doing so, judging from how the bread has looked since the 4th. Work backwards and forwards. Future proves past/Past proves future.
>They can end this at any time by simply asking POTUS, right?
>We may have to 'force' this one
It's no different than making memes anon, we're only as good as that which we have to work with.
They'll keep writing articles but eventually they will be FORCED to ask POTUS because all of this started moving in-earnest with him winning the election. An abundance of articles will beg verification, POTUS will lay out the truth, as much of it as he can without hurting the movement. Q is a whistleblower, not a leaker, whistleblowers are protected under the law.
Y'all believe in 4D chess yet?
A truthful answer would be 'both'. You went against anons wishes on bans and spat in BO's face over too. Begone or assume anonymity again. Your rep 'if you wanna call it that', is tarnished here.