>>20937049 lb
ARE FOR THE YOU-[AL]WAYS-LIKE-THIS?
Well I could be wrong but it seems you're always upset about something and trying to use Contract-Writing in communication with me on this board. Have you noticed : Chief doesn't use Quantum-Grammar when communicating with the Public… other than perhaps Casual-Quantum?
Why do you think that is?
[You]s seems fairly obvious.
What about the… ?
How about (you) do (you) & I'll be me?
I'm not here for the teaching of the Quantum-Grammar. Cause void of the Authorization. ''Though casual-quantum is ok."
I'm here sharing and pointing to what I believe the Q-Posts and comms from certain peeps in the wild reveal… that's it.
Also… I'm not paid to do as I do.