Anonymous ID: d04eca June 3, 2024, 5:26 a.m. No.20959533   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20959496

"For well over a hundred years, a large portion of academic philosophy has been devoted to explaining that philosophy is either impossible or useless or both, thereby philosophy proves it can safely and happily survive its own death by keeping itself busy that it has actually died." L. KOLAKOWSKI

Anonymous ID: d04eca June 3, 2024, 8:09 a.m. No.20960094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS

 

We all learn what we already know. That the government and big pharma are one and the same.

 

The New York Post reveals thatscientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received $710 million in royalties from drug makers during the pandemic years, from late 2021 to 2023. This information was previously concealed by the NIH.

 

The majority of these royalties, approximately $690 million, were collected by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and its 260 scientists.

 

The data was uncovered through litigation initiated by http://OpenTheBooks.com, which also revealed that between September 2009 and October 2021, NIH scientists received $325 million in royalties across 56,000 transactions.

 

It is unclear if royalties from Covid vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna are included in the new figures, noting that Moderna settled with the NIH by agreeing to pay $400 million. Dr. Anthony Fauci and his deputy, Dr. David Morens, are also mentioned in the context of evading scrutiny and the need for transparency in their communications and depositions.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/06/02/opinion/nih-scientists-made-710m-in-royalties-from-drug-makers-a-fact-they-tried-to-hide/

Anonymous ID: d04eca June 3, 2024, 8:18 a.m. No.20960154   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Remember when Fauci lied by calling the truth Rand Paul spoke as lies, and then documents were released proving Fauci lied?

 

Prosecute Fauci

Anonymous ID: d04eca June 3, 2024, 8:24 a.m. No.20960180   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0204

>>20960144

>your definition or mine

So you're just spewing your own made up definition and then attacking anon who you just admitted must be using a different definition that ISN'T what you just accused Anon of doing? For the same exact action?

>Your definition or mine

So you're admitting that when you blithely accuse Anon of cursing you, which goes BEYOND just your made up definition and makes a declarative statement about the content and actions of another, you're really just verbally describing your own definition and not at all describing the actual actions of anon?

>Your definition or mine

You believe your mind can only subjectively 'define' words, that everything you say is just your made up language, that has no bearing on reality as it really is?

kmao, fucking hermeneutics is an embarrassment. Do better.

Anonymous ID: d04eca June 3, 2024, 8:30 a.m. No.20960222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0243 >>0251

>>20960204

>blah blah blah

>contradicts own garage by insisting everyone else is just spewing definitions, while the accuser is illicitly claiming objective bird's eye view for himself that transcends the very limits imposed on everyone else.

>Language is made up

Language is a mapping to real things. It isn't entirely devoid of ontological meaing. Otherwise your declaration of being 'cursed' would just be your own definition, like 'defining' getting shot in the head as 'a nice massage'.

>loser

ummmm