Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 12:17 a.m. No.209733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9750 >>9856 >>0178

Apologies if this has already been covered, but repeating my post from 1/24. Believe these Ds that voted against RR confirmation must be some of the primary bad people present at secret meetings and who knows what else. These 6 sure appear to be important part of the situation and likely very involved right now. Hope this helps!

 

"Q said earlier to 'reconcile this. 6 Senators voted AGAINST Rosenstein.

 

Blumenthal

Booker

Masto

Gillibrand

Harris

Warren

 

Sessions was confirmed mostly along party lines. Why did the SIX Ds listed above vote against RR? What did they know, suspect or fear causing them to object to RR? Why didn't RR confirmation vote also break along party lines? Could these 6 be part of or linked to the secret society? Are they all merely rabid HRC supporters who benefitted from O and HRC Administration? What do these 6 have to hide?"

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 12:27 a.m. No.209780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9787

>>209750

I'm thinking they're part of the 19 or (now) 16

Yes, all totally corrupt, but likely part of the really bad group guiding things? Have not heard much from EW lately….

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 12:32 a.m. No.209810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>209787

Maybe part of meeting in a SKIF to talk about how to control / spin the memo or contain damage from it. Doubt they're named in memo. Think this is a 'group' that needs to be watched as events unfold.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 12:57 a.m. No.209880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9954

>>209856

YES - and he's out every day railing against POTUS, spreading his/D vile fake news talking points. As a group, I think there is something going on here. Booker was also hyper-crazed when Homeland Security Secy. was testifying - horrible to her and grandstanding as usual. Go back to the Q drop where he said to 'reconcile' confirmation votes for Sessions and RR - I believe he wanted us to look specifically at all 6 of the ones voting against RR and keep watching them.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 1:05 a.m. No.209915   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9921 >>9954

>>209856

MAYBE those 6 who voted against RR for confirmation knew somehow that RR was going to help Jeff S. & POTUS and not be involved any more with the traitors at DOJ/FBI - or otherwise under McCabe, etc.'s thumb/control.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 1:31 a.m. No.209994   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0006

>>209954

The memo did not exist when the 6 voted against confirming RR. Just looping back to that snapshot in time - RR confirmation vote. Good point about the other Ds (who all voted to confirm RR) likely not knowing what these 6 knew early on. Also, it's possible RR went to Ryan and begged him not to release memo as part of the effort to make it more incendiary and amp up the focus on the memo. Or, RR could be a big part of the problem - but I'm leaning toward thinking he is not.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 1:34 a.m. No.210010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>209997

Maybe it has actually helped a couple of people, but CFPB is a HUGE slush fund financing SJW and other troublemakers - giant pipeline of $$ for everything anti-MAGA. Mulveney brought in to clean up that swamp.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 1:38 a.m. No.210023   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210006

I know - they're all so venal and horrible. It becomes difficult to pinpoint an exact 'involvement' because they're all spread throughout everything dreadful. We're urgently needing Mr. Binney's thin thread to keep up with the huge web of connections, lies and corruption!

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 2:27 a.m. No.210190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210140

RR was career - had been with DOJ for years and was a pretty non-controversial choice. He was not a Trump political appointment - he was long serving person at DOJ - logical choice. Yep, they had to confirm someone.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 2:34 a.m. No.210203   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0216 >>0251

>>210180

Looking at their Committee memberships - want to figure out who has highest security clearances and who would be entitled to be in a SKIF - that should help figure out who the 3 Senators and 7 Congress people are…Look to Committee assignments - could help ID these people - plus take into consideration who voted against RR. Blumenthal is very likely one of them.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 2:58 a.m. No.210247   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210235

Pelosi, on CNN yesterday, told Chris Cuomo he DID NOT KNOW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT when he brought up that Wray had read the memo on Sunday and did not object to releasing it. ONLY true thing hag Pelosi has ever said !!!! Unreal exchange - need to meme this!!

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 3 a.m. No.210255   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210251

Next Thread, will post on Gang of 8 Intelligence group - very important and likely they are running things on the bad side out of Congress.

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 3:04 a.m. No.210264   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210251

THANK you - will also dig into Gang of 8 Intelligence - maybe all of them plus some others on House side are ring leading this in Congress - and likely making a last ditch stand in the coming days and weeks….we want to be prepared !!

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 3:25 a.m. No.210289   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>210268

Treasury Dept. / investigators have a HUGE role to clean this up and help drain the swamp - Patriots who I'm sure will be working hard for all of us. Thank you Secy. Mnuchin !!

Anonymous ID: 4863ab Jan. 30, 2018, 3:32 a.m. No.210304   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0311 >>0408

>>210290

>>210290

Yes. Security Group "Gang of 8" in Senate is Mark Warner and Schumer. Maybe add Harris (CA) b/c she voted against RR and is on Intelligence Co. But also think Blumenthal is part of it. Some array of these could be the 3, but there are also other possibilities. Working to sort out Congressional side - lots of choices, but Schiff, Pelosi and….need to add the others. Unsure about contractors.