>>2096760 (lb)
>>2096982 (lb)
Okay I'm back after a little digging. So I started with a little info on two of the companies.
Then I found an article from 2015 talking about a Clinton shell company investing in Colombia. I found a bit about the company, obviously I'm thinking it's a euphemism for cocaine, but it could be "legit" as far as just producing juice. Obviously there's the angle of distribution as well.
But then I went back and looked at the text from the EO and I'm not a lawfag, but I'll be damned if it doesn't pretty much blanket cover everything. Because if those three people, Sec Treasury, Sec State, AG, know that someone is tied to corruption, then they can shut down everything related to them. So if the NSA has all of the communications…literally all of their funds could very well be frozen/being searched for.
Also, the way it's written, the EO Asset Seizure could come from literally anywhere. And the person doesn't have to have been convicted either. Their indictment could very well still be sealed. It just says as long as that person has been "determined" by the 3 individuals stated above to be involved in corruption. So I don't really see any point in trying to dig any more on this as no conviction is required to freeze the assets.