>>2097458 (lb)
<call him granny, that'll get him
<wait, why would i say that? must be a weird Oedipus complex projection thing
<uh oh, better use the smarter-than-thou card
<muh notables, even though he never said it was a notable, but fuck that, he disagreed with me, so, muh notables
<use smarter-than-thou again, make him feel bad
<make a threat to seal the deal
<do this end of bread so he can reply & i can repeat
<make sure that they all know how passionate about this civil suit i really am
State: Michigan
Since this seems to be such a huge trigger…
Shareblue
While I admire your enthusiasm, I have to ask some question here.
Do you really think that this is all about Q?
OR, is it about WE THE PEOPLE taking our power back from those who have held us in virtual bondage for thousands of years?
What exactly do you tell the people around you about Q, and/or about the plan? And how is it working for you so far?
And finally, why are you asking anons to do what we've already been doing?
RE: concerns about the board
Have you ever seen a clean battlefield? A war of information [@] is no different. Friendlies & enemies all over the place, fire from [all sides]. This should be no surprise. Endure to the end. Or GTFO.
Who the fuck asked you?
>Technology so far ahead of what we currently accept will appear as magic
Arthur C. Clarke
Clarke's three laws
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.