That time of the month already?
You and your comrades try the same shit at least once a month
"muh censorship" "muh deletions"
Tell you to make your own board, your sperg for the rest of the bread
But you had your own board once, didn't you?
/hivemind/
Several breads over there until somebody had a tantrum and deleted it all down to one with only a single post in it
Anons didn't buy you were OG when the thing started and didn't show up
I'll bet real money anons didn't follow your little link either
So here it it time to piss and moan yet again
Does it bother you that the fedcoats have more creativity than you do?
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals…
What is really interesting about the use of Alinsky’s simplistic tactics is that they were designed to be used by people with low intelligence – those whose lips move when they read. If they EVER read. Tools and fools. CNN’s audience.
Watch any video where the regular liberal “marchers” get interviewed and you will find that they can go no further, in a thought process, then the words they heard on CNN. They don’t have a message. They have a memorized chant which they cannot explain, or enlarge on. These people have no idea of what a concept is. They are very likely, these days, to be vaccine damaged.
When you understand this actuality, these Alinsky people become fun to watch.
Be aware that most proponents, and users, of these liberal tactics hide behind fake identities for GOOD reason.
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”
Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”
It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”
Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
What is REALLY interesting is that Saul Alinsky died in 1972, almost 50 years ago…
So, these political tactics are, at a minimum, fifty years old. They were designed to deal with a political situation in existence during the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s – a world totally different from today. Yet, many activist groups laud these tactics without realizing their in-appropriateness in the 2020 world.
What Alinsky, and his followers, failed to comprehend is that they created a whole generation of people who cannot see beyond screaming criticism and offer any modern day solutions to social problems beyond a social shift to the hungry and dreary world of socialism/communism – something they definitely do not actually want to happen.
The counter reaction to this situation has been the rise of the humongous populist movement that elected Donald Trump. This group doesn’t put up with Alinsky-like nonsense. They outnumber the Alinski-ites 100,000 to 1.
Tim Bolen
https://bolenreport.com/saul-alinskys-12-rules-radicals/
They're heeeeeere
It's called "defenestration"
Worry more about those veterans sleeping on the sidewalks when they are told about how 400k VA claims are behind while 115k claims for illegals were processed
She aint black
California's Kamala Harris becomes first Indian-American US senator
Associated Press Nov 9, 2016, 12:20 AM EST
Attorney General Kamala Harris wins the open Senate seat to replace retiring Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer in race that featured two Democrats in California.
Thanks to California's unusual primary system, in which the two top finishers from the June primary advance to the general election, voters were deciding between Harris and Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez.
The victory for 51-year-old Harris makes her the first Indian-American senator. Harris was backed by President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and other top Democrats.
Sanchez, a 10-term congresswoman, tried to consolidate support from Republicans and Latinos, but with little success.
https://www.businessinsider.com/californias-kamala-harris-becomes-first-indian-american-us-senator-2016-11
Another Saturday, Beer Run not complete
I get it, you fedshills came up through community colleges until getting your scholarships for Interpretive Dance so were never really college freshmen and thus Beer Run is a foreign concept to you
When you don't Tokyo Drift you go Nagoya Stylin"
Meh, more like testing the defenses to see if the BVs are around
Chinese Fighter Jets Approached Dutch Ship ‘Unsafely’, Netherlands Says
Reuters June 8, 2024
AMSTERDAM, June 8 (Reuters) – Chinese air force jets circled a Dutch frigate and approached a Dutch helicopter in the East China Sea in a way that “caused a potentially unsafe situation,” the Netherlands’ Defense Ministry said on Saturday.
In a statement, the Ministry said the HNLMS Tromp was patrolling on Friday in support of U.N. sanctions against North Korea when it was circled several times by two Chinese fighter jets.
Later, the ship’s NH90 helicopter was approached by two Chinese fighter jets and a helicopter.
“The incident took place in international airspace,” the ministry said.
The Tromp is heading for Japan next and then to Hawaii for the “Rim of the Pacific” naval exercises.
https://gcaptain.com/chinese-fighter-jets-approached-dutch-ship-unsafely-netherlands-says/
Chinese Fighter Jets Approached Dutch Ship ‘Unsafely’, Netherlands Says
Reuters June 8, 2024
AMSTERDAM, June 8 (Reuters) – Chinese air force jets circled a Dutch frigate and approached a Dutch helicopter in the East China Sea in a way that “caused a potentially unsafe situation,” the Netherlands’ Defense Ministry said on Saturday.
In a statement, the Ministry said the HNLMS Tromp was patrolling on Friday in support of U.N. sanctions against North Korea when it was circled several times by two Chinese fighter jets.
Later, the ship’s NH90 helicopter was approached by two Chinese fighter jets and a helicopter.
“The incident took place in international airspace,” the ministry said.
The Tromp is heading for Japan next and then to Hawaii for the “Rim of the Pacific” naval exercises.
https://gcaptain.com/chinese-fighter-jets-approached-dutch-ship-unsafely-netherlands-says/
No, spammers have done it before