>>20994395 (pb)
>why are almost all old notables deleted?
they weren't deleted, but archived.
Archived means hotlinks don't work.
Archiving happens when threads fall off the catalog.
Images+videos are deleted at that time too.
They weren't re-posted anywhere, but that's currently done on >>>/qnotables23/ and >>>/qnotables22/ board (going deeper into the past as time passes, most images weren't saved before mid 2020 though)
They are archived on here, BUT you need to look up posts all by yourself, manually.
All hotlinks do not work.
You can't click.
You have to go to a specific thread, and search for the post #.
Well until all of that is re-posted, but it will take a while to reach 2018.
>You can search here https://qresear.ch/
What sucks is that you can't select "notables only".
that doesn't help.
a simple checkbox limiting search to notable posts is all one needs.
adding "notable" to the search won't work like that.
also notable buns are in the search results too, tons of these, not just final buns, but all buns.
No, that looks for posts that have "covid" as well as "notable" inside of them.
That's why I only get 17 hits, which is ridiculous.
What you are saying does not work.
It finds posts with all the words you included in the search.
Adding "notable" as a word does not limit the found posts to notabled posts only. It will instead look for posts that also include "notable" as a word.
>Somehow NWO was able to program people to do this.
The medical system is designed to be like that. Military-style.
It's nothing new.
You can't figure out if something got notable'd, because that is not part of the post.
Notable'd = put into notable list by a baker, that's outside of the post itself.
That's the problem.
and even if that was the case (which it isn't, no board owner has the ability to block Q's trip), Q has various methods to auth.
Q has his own fucking board.
Q doesn't even require /qresearch/.
Q also doesn't require a tripcode.
So none of that even makes some basic sense.
That won't happen though, because it would require Jim to monitor notables and modify posts accordingly.
We already got a working parser, current notables are even re-posted, and have been re-posted for over a year, but that's not taken in by qresear.ch. That would be the easiest approach.
To tag the posts, Jim would have to know which is notable, and which isn't.
You have to track what bakers are doing, and Jim would have to do that to be able to mark posts accordingly.
the baker
the baker can't edit html.
the baker also can't edit other posts, unless BV and it would be a horrible idea if someone edited all notable posts (pretending that would even be do-able)