Anonymous ID: 17d070 July 9, 2018, 7:52 p.m. No.2100124   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0228

>>2100086

Another lawfag, here. I feel the same. He wrote a dissent in the Heller case and the reasoning was largely adopted by the SCt. Also pointed out that if an “assault rifle” (he made clear that was a fuzzy term) could be used as an offensive weapon, it could obviously also be used for a defensive one.