As former President Donald Trump looks to the U.S. Supreme Court for answers on his claims of presidential immunity, a Republican group has launched an ad campaign in opposition.

Republicans for the Rule of Law launched a $2 million TV ad campaign featuring conservatives arguing that the Supreme Court should reject the former president's immunity claim.

Supreme Court justices are considering a case involving Trump and whether presidents have immunity from criminal prosecutions. Trump's team argued that the president must have immunity for a functioning democracy to flourish, while the attorney for the federal government argued that presidents don't enjoy blanket criminal immunity.

The nation's highest court heard those oral arguments in the case on April 25.

The ad campaign is set to air in 12 states, including Alabama and Texas and states that are directly affected by these arguments, such as Georgia and Pennsylvania.

"Our constitutional system is predicated on legal accountability and equal justice under the law, even for presidents and past presidents," said Sarah Longwell, executive director of Republicans for the Rule of Law. "Conservatives feel this in our bones: No man or woman is above the law. In this case, that means rejecting the 'absolute immunity' claim."

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_f3b9d7a4-273b-11ef-892c-a77dfe9b17fb.html

>>21001412

>>21001474

so, if epstein was a part of the cia, that means cia was raping, torturing and murdering children? and because they are cia they are allowed to do it without and consequences?

is that correct?

>>21001493

yeah well it's one thing to vote and another thing to actually get results

will their new leaders start writing strongly worded letters like republicans do here in America?

So apparently the US Supreme Court has just given 40 US states the green light to begin issuing their own gold and silver-backed currencies.

Quote from the SC decision:

“The United States maintains a dual system of banking, made up of parallel federal and state banking systems. That dual system allows privately owned banks to choose whether to obtain a charter from the Federal Government or from a state government.”

There has been a recent development regarding state-sponsored banks and their ability to issue gold and silver-backed currencies. Let’s explore this further:

Supreme Court Ruling:

The Supreme Court upheld the state’s right to maintain its own charter and allow state banks to issue gold-backed currency, bypassing the Federal Reserve’s corporate system1.

This ruling was released on May 30, 2024, and marks a significant step toward decentralization in the banking sector.

Dual Banking System:

Each state in the USA operates its own banking system, parallel to the Federal Reserve.

State-sponsored banks now have the option to acquire gold reserves and disband from the Federal Reserve system.

This effectively establishes a dual banking system where state banks can operate independently of the corporate Fed system.

Implications:

States that choose to issue gold and silver-backed currencies can potentially reduce their reliance on the Federal Reserve.

It also opens the door for alternative forms of currency within individual states.

Other States:

South Carolina, for example, has taken steps toward recognizing gold and silver as legal tender23.

Louisiana, Utah, and Texas have also passed legislation recognizing gold and silver as legal tender

This development reflects a growing interest in alternative monetary systems and highlights the ongoing debate over the role of central banks and state autonomy.

https://citizenwatchreport.com/us-supreme-court-decision-40-us-states-can-now-issue-their-own-gold-silver-backed-currencies/