Nancy, as a Catholic, how do you reconcile your admission of responsiblity about Jan 6 security laxity, and your subsequent admonishment, and impeachment, of Donald John Trump for the same thing that you admitted was your fault?
>>21005257
Catholics don't have issues with other people's . . . lax morality, others who claim to be catholic, but seem to . . . have issues.
in fact the stories of the saints are full of cases of people who are members of the Catholic Church, sometimes even popes and bishops, treating other people, also Catholics, and many of whom were later vindicated through being declared Saints or Doctors of the Most Holy Church.
the stories of Catholics always include some Catholics who don't seem to do all that they could do, and often behave badly.
Apologetics for the Most Holy Church don't include excuses for those who are members of that church who do not own up to their own sinfulness, and do not treat others at the level that one expects of holy people.
Nancy needs to do a public 'mea culpa' and apologize to America, and President Donald John Trump
The poster is a bestiality monger.
the person depicted probably would object to the doctored image of her with a frog doing that . . .
Catholics do have issues with other people's lax morality but not in the sense that they take blame for the sins of others. Does that make more sense? that is what I meant: her sin doesn't degrade the Holy Catholic Church.
in any case you're a horror show and now filtered.
the posts with copious text that rail against some religion based upon the behaviors of the few
are always tagged with markup that makes them obvious.
And hence they are an easy filter.
and that if you do post to them often they are already deleted when you see your post (as shown by the text of the post number not being an actual link to a post) isn't really an issue because the BV have realized that this spam is often posted and is always full of hatred and slander, disrespect, and venom.
The anon have seen it all before, and that is why it's called 'spam'.
no. It was the Free Masons and their 'land reform' in Italy where 'public land' of the Vatican States was suddenly claimed by the new country of Italy and all the people who had traditionally worked that land were told to GTFO.
the deal was land owned by the church was exempt from taxation so land owners (Shepards and farmers) would deed it to the church so that it would not be taxed.
And when the Vatican States fell to the Free Masons (in 1870 or so) suddenly the land situation changed.
That, coupled with earth quakes ( very devastating) resulted in famine.
and the racism of the North against the South and prevailing stereo types about Southern Italians, resulted in them being like second class citizens and so they migrated to America where they were loved (for the hard working and joyful people who they are).
one or two lawsuits about twisted ankles on a rainy day would get the municipality to pave that properly.
look up who ran England at that time and you'll find the same crew that run the banks, won't you?
a name that we've all heard over and over again.
you remember your oaths, and let others worry about themselves, manipulator.
ah, so i find that the manipulator is also a garbage poster of stale Q.
will this hold up under constitutional muster if appealed, because of the Second Amendment, to the Supreme Court?
using unjust laws used to convict people is unjust.
I know people don't like the Biden's but having a gun is a constitutional right even for a drug addict, in my opinion.