Anonymous ID: 833a26 June 12, 2024, 11:01 a.m. No.21011511   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1834 >>1855 >>1867 >>1878 >>1893 >>1916 >>1943

WASHINGTON: "Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee accused some of the biggest Wall Street firms Tuesday of colluding with advocacy groups to force participation in environmental, social, and governance investing, raising anticipation for a hearing featuring activist investors this week. An interim report published Tuesday by House Judiciary Committee staff details what it describes as “new, direct evidence” of a “climate cartel” consisting of left-wing activist groups and major financial institutions working together to force companies to decarbonize. The report accuses the “cartel” of colluding with companies by leveraging negotiations with management, filing shareholder resolutions, or voting out or threatening to replace board members in order to ramp up or escalate pressure against leaders who failed to take action on ESG investing.

The House report also focused heavily on the actions of groups such as Climate Action 100+, a more than 700-member investor group focused on emissions reduction efforts. Climate Action 100+, it said, “bullies” asset managers to join and then pressures them to align their efforts and shareholder votes with the group’s broader decarbonization goals.

The report also accused the Biden administration of failing to “meaningfully investigate the climate cartel’s collusion, let alone bring enforcement actions against its apparent violations of longstanding U.S. antitrust law.”

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy-and-environment/3037634/climate-cartel-house-judiciary-committee-gop-accuses-wall-street-collusion-esg/

Anonymous ID: 833a26 June 12, 2024, 11:18 a.m. No.21011601   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1605 >>1655 >>1873 >>1889 >>1970

Jordan [Climate Control Hearing]: Are you for ending the internal combustion engine in the next ten years?

Lubber [Climate Action 100+]: That is the direction that our government is going, and I think it's the direction that the automakers have determined makes sense, yes.

Jordan: You agree with that, getting rid of the internal combustion engine in ten years?

Lubber: Yes.

Jordan: Are you for reducing airline flight travel by twelve percent?

Lubber: I don't know the numbers for airline flight.

Issa: Did you fly here [DC] or drive?

Lubber: I flew here from Boston.

Issa: Would you have gotten here if there was no petro-chemical industry as it is today?

Lubber: No.