Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:03 p.m. No.21012872   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2879 >>2899

>>21012837

I have to wonder if this was the same FIB office that the group tracking pedos followed the dude into after he thought he was going to meet a 15 year-old for sex

Somewhere out West, and posted withing the last two days. Was it Seattle or Portland?

Anons know

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:07 p.m. No.21012885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3003 >>3060 >>3356 >>3460 >>3540

What happens if the strikers are replaced by illegals, that get work visas for it, but work twice as hard for less than half the hourly rate and no benefits?

 

Potential Strike Action at U.S. East and Gulf Coast Ports Threatens Further Disruption

Mike Schuler June 12, 2024

 

The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) has suspended negotiations with the United States Maritime Alliance over a new labor contract for dockworkers at U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports, fueling concerns over potential strike action that could exacerbate already strained supply chains.

 

The current labor contract is set to expire at the end of September.

 

Peter Sand, Chief Analyst at freight benchmarking firm Xeneta, says the threat could accelerate the front-loading of imports by shippers already faced with Red Sea disruptions.

 

“The frontloading of imports is part of a toxic cocktail of factors which has caused severe port congestion in Asia and Europe and the dramatic increases of more than USD 2 000 per FEU in ocean freight container shipping spot rates. It seems shippers are caught in a vicious circle where any action they take to protect their supply chains can result in making the situation worse,” said Sand.

 

Recent data from Xeneta reveals that average spot rates from the Far East to the U.S. East Coast have surged by 64% since the end of April. During the first four months of 2024, more than 40% of total container imports from the Far East into the U.S. arrived via ports on the East and Gulf coasts.

 

Sand further suggested that shippers might consider importing into the U.S. West Coast, should disruptions on the East Coast become a major concern. However, he warns that this could tighten capacity and keep rates higher for longer.

 

The situation recalls last year’s prolonged labor negotiations between the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) on the West Coast, which resulted in West Coast ports losing market share as containerized imports shifted east.

 

“If an agreement cannot be reached and strike action takes place when ocean freight container networks are still under extreme pressure, it could be a hugely difficult end to 2024,” said Sand.

 

https://gcaptain.com/potential-strike-action-at-u-s-east-and-gulf-coast-ports-threatens-further-disruption/

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:32 p.m. No.21012982   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3021

>>21012892

 

Dispatcher: "911 what's your emergency?"

Fed: "There's an armed woman somewhere in our building and we need the police"

Dispatcher: What is the address of the building?"

Fed: "Downtown, corner of Third Avenue and Spring Street"

Dispatcher: "Sir, I show that as the FBI building, aren't there armed personnel there?"

Fed: "Those are only Field Agents, they are off planning, I mean, solving, crimes. Most of us here are just administrative"

Dispatcher: "I dispatch some units right away"

Supervisor: "did I hear that right? Feds are calling the cops?"

Dispatcher: "You heard that right, feds need cops"

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:41 p.m. No.21013025   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3043

>>21012992

Meh, majority of the "famefag" posts are our resident troll. The one that went from "Mimic" to "Angry Inch"

The creature has no life, but started a failed crusade against "board personalities" to make itself relevant

It lives for the (You)s and if ignored long enough will sperg out in red text which of course will get the attention of passing BVs and then poof, all gone like it never existed

It's here every day, not hard to spot

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:57 p.m. No.21013096   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3120

>>21012958

>Seems like the argument shills are struggling pretty hard with diatribe today to drum up arguments over nothing.

 

Only tactic that's ever had any effect. Start arguments to waste bread and bury goodies. First down into the Previously Collected, then into the archives. It is vital they keep breads moving and memory-hole whatever they can.

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 4:59 p.m. No.21013103   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Op-Ed: Shattering the Lynchpin Myth: The US Army’s Misguided Dominance in Pacific Strategy

John Konrad June 12, 2024

 

by Captain John Konrad (gCaptain Op-Ed) In a viral video with over 200,000 views on X, General Charles Flynn, a 4-star Army commander in the Pacific and brother of former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn, delivered a passionate yet misguided speech on the primacy of the Army in the Pacific theater – a strategy his command has been calling linchpin – where he told seapower strategists to “zip-it“. As he leaned into the camera, his words dripped with the fervor of a man defending a bygone era of military dominance, oblivious to the evolving realities of modern warfare in the maritime domain.

 

Flynn’s assertion that the Pacific is an “Army theater” because it’s labeled as a “joint operation” is laughable. The notion that artillery and ground forces could effectively dominate a region spanning 60 million square miles of ocean is a strategic fantasy. It’s as if the battles of Midway, Coral Sea, and Leyte Gulf never happened—battles that decisively showcased the indispensability of naval and air power in the Pacific.

 

These Army Generals are seriously unhinged. They had their time in the sun and lost repeatedly. Now they fear losing control.

Even IF the Pacific was a “land power theater” we don’t want more of the same

We want, we need, different tactics and strategies

This guy is dangerous https://t.co/cbX6fwtoV0

— John ? Konrad V (@johnkonrad) June 12, 2024

 

His rhetoric ignores the sobering realities of recent Army failures in the maritime domain. The Army’s decision to divest from watercraft capabilities, the alarming age and inefficiency of their Corps of Engineers ships, the fact the Corps resorted on heavy US Coast Guard and civilian contractor support to clear the Baltimore Bridge, the embarrassing collapse of the JLOTS pier in Gaza, and their plans to divest Army prepositioning ships all point to a service struggling to maintain relevance in an increasingly maritime-centric world.

 

Let’s break down Flynn’s delusions. He suggests that the Army can seamlessly coordinate with the militaries of island nations—countries that prioritize land forces due to economic constraints and rely on American naval power for protection. This overlooks the fundamental reason for their reliance on ground troops: they lack the resources to maintain a formidable navy or air force. Flynn’s vision of a land-centric war in the Pacific dismisses the critical roles of the Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, and Merchant Marine.

 

In the event of a conflict with China, the logistics of moving and sustaining Army equipment across vast oceanic distances would necessitate a robust naval and air presence. Flynn’s dismissive attitude towards these branches undermines the essence of joint operations. Jointness doesn’t mean sidelining the Navy and Air Force; it means leveraging the unique strengths of each service to create a cohesive and effective force.

 

In this context, the Army’s claim of being a pivotal joint logistics facilitator is undermined by the current condition of the U.S. sealift capabilities. As noted by Air Force General Jacqueline D. Van Ovost, the TransCom commander, the United States is “alarmingly behind in modernizing a viable sealift fleet to achieve our national goals.” Additionally, the deteriorating and diminishing Ready Reserve Force faces a critical shortage, lacking 1,800 mariners required to staff its ships.

 

This isn’t merely about joint operations. It’s about asserting what Flynn believes is the Army’s rightful dominance in the Department of Defense budget and influence. If the focus was on inter-service cooperation for victory, the General would have incorporated the US Coast Guard, US Merchant Marine, and US Space Force into his discourse. Notably, he only called attention to the US Navy and US Air Force, the two services that compete with him directly for control.

 

The reality is stark: the Pacific conflict, if it comes to pass, will require a diverse and integrated approach. It will demand the mobility and firepower of the Navy, the reach and precision of the Air Force, the versatility of the Marines, the reach of the Coast Guard, and the logistical backbone of the Merchant Marine. Flynn’s vision of an Army-dominated theater is not only impractical but also dangerous.

 

More:

https://gcaptain.com/army-lynchpin-myth-pacific/

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 5:16 p.m. No.21013171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3174 >>3177

>>21013153

You are exposed

 

Same phrasing of the previous bullshit where you tried to dominate an entire bread. The bread that BVs showed up and nuked your bullshit

Not sure if you are alphabet fraud or just DOAR faggot, but you are not here to support anons or this movement

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 5:48 p.m. No.21013357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3450 >>3490

>>21013284

They had their board, demanded after losing Q Research, for a few months. When they found out they were talking amongst themselves because anons wouldn't waste their tie, they had a temper tantrum and wiped away what breads they did have.

Jan 28th is their little "board is comped, goodbye and follow us here" post

Anonymous ID: 1394bb June 12, 2024, 5:57 p.m. No.21013408   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21013387

Yet you and your team never post any digs

Bitching about BO

Wanting to have the board surrendered to you (HINT: not gonna happen)

Trying to disrupt with your countdowns, and "testing" anons

You are nothing more than a minion of evil