Israel
October 7
10/7
17
Q?
https://rumble.com/embed/v4yozmo/?pub=4
Thomas Massie SPEAKS OUT Against AIPAC
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC /ˈeɪpæk/ AY-pak) is a lobbying group that advocates pro-Israel policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States.
Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
>Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
>Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
>Every Republican in Congress has an ‘AIPAC babysitter’: US lawmaker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74ZA-GdeQP4
<AIPAC The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC /ˈeɪpæk/ AY-pak) is a lobbying group that advocates pro-Israel policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States.
916
Mar 10 2018
916
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 88957f No.613229 📁
Mar 10 2018 13:04:36 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 436341 No.613193 📁
Mar 10 2018 13:02:22 (EST)
C8F91EAD-51C7-47FA-96C5-C….jpeg⬇
>>613129
What about Awan.
Is Israel involved?
>>613193
We are saving Israel for last.
Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
Q
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 88957f No.613229 📁
Mar 10 2018 13:04:36 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 436341 No.613193 📁
Mar 10 2018 13:02:22 (EST)
C8F91EAD-51C7-47FA-96C5-C….jpeg⬇
>>613129
What about Awan.
Is Israel involved?
>>613193
We are saving Israel for last.
Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
Q
How Israel Made AIPAC: The Most Harmful Foreign Influence Operation in America Paperback – September 25, 2022
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has recently established its own political action committees (PACs). AIPAC is using tens of millions of dollars of PAC money to knock off candidates for office it believes won’t be sufficiently deferential to the government of Israel. There is a lot of current analysis about this in social and even legacy news media. Most of it has one thing in common: no history about how, when or why AIPAC came into existence.
What exactly is AIPAC and where does it come from? Who founded AIPAC, and when? What did AIPAC’s founder do before creating a lobby for Israel in the U.S.? What happened when he ran into trouble with the White House, Senate and Department of Justice? How does AIPAC history inform us about foreign influence on U.S. political campaigns and American Middle East policy today? Those are questions we answer in this book!
Editorial Reviews
Review
…Grant F. Smith tells the story of how, in the 1960s, a strenuous effort was made to have AIPAC register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). This effort was led by Sen. J.W. Fulbright (D-AR) and Rabbi Elmer Berger of the American Council for Judaism and received support from the Department of Justice. Unfortunately, it was not successful. Now, AIPAC has formed a political action committee and is contributing millions of dollars to defeat candidates who express support for Palestinian rights. The case which was made in the 1960s for AIPAC's registration as a foreign agent of Israel may be even stronger today.
To understand how AIPAC works and what its goals are, a careful reading will provide the necessary historical perspective. AIPAC often promotes itself as speaking for American Jews. Nothing could be further from the truth. The overwhelming majority of Jewish Americans, for example support the creation of a Palestinian state and supported the nuclear agreement with Iran, which AIPAC vigorously opposed.
Grant Smith understands that religion and nationality are separate and distinct. Americans of Jewish faith are American by nationality and Jews by religion, a concept which AIPAC and the government of Israel do not seem to understand. This will open the eyes of many who may not understand the dynamics involved in this question.
Allan C. Brownfeld, Editor, ISSUES, the quarterly journal of the American Council for Judaism
In our media filled with war, chaos and propaganda, Grant F. Smith's book is the real thing—illumination of a critical issue by a superb investigative journalist. Thanks to Smith's brilliant mining of the declassified documents of Isaiah L. Kenan and his Zionist lobby collaborators, the truth can indeed set us free.
James W. Douglass, author, JFK and the Unspeakable
About the Author
Grant F. Smith lives in Washington, DC where he researches and writes about U.S. Middle East policy formulation. Smith is director of the nonprofit Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep).
In his three decade professional career as a researcher, Smith has investigated financial services and global telecommunications industries, worked in twenty-two countries assessing the impact of regulatory and trade regime changes and managed multi-country research teams. Smith has a BA in International Relations from the University of Minnesota and MIM (Master of International Management) from the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul.
In 2014, Smith sued the Department of Defense in federal court and won release of a detailed report, about the advanced state of Israel's nuclear weapons program. The Nation wrote about it in the article "It's Official: The Pentagon Finally Admitted That Israel Has Nuclear Weapons, Too."
In 2015, Smith sued the Central Intelligence Agency and won release of 131 pages of formerly classified information revealing its overseas agents obtained compelling evidence that Israel stole U.S. government-owned weapons-grade uranium in the 1960s to build its first atom bombs. The CIA's refusal to share this information thwarted two FBI investigations into the diversion.
Smith's essays about the lobby are frequently published at the Antiwar.com news website and the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs magazine.
This book is Smith's tenth about the Israel lobby. IRmep is co-sponsor of the annual conference about Israel, the Israel lobby, Palestine, elections and free speech at the National Press Club. It has become a gathering point for a broad range of intellectuals, activists, reporters and educators determined to expose and defeat institutionalized corruption driving deadly and wasteful U.S. Middle East policy formulation.
Tampa Bay Times
https://www.tampabay.com › why…
Why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep paying tech expert suspected of stealing House computers?
BREAKING NEWS
Why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep paying tech expert suspected of stealing House computers?
By
Alex Leary | Times Washington bureau chief
Published July 26, 2017
The following is from the Miami Herald:
When a computer expert who worked for congressional Democrats was accused of stealing computers and data systems in February, members of Congress cut him loose within days, leaving Imran Awan with no supporters five months later.
Except for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The Weston Democrat has not explained why she continued to employ Awan until Tuesday, when she fired him — after he was arrested on bank-fraud charges at Dulles International Airport in Virginia attempting to board a flight to Pakistan.
Nor has she elaborated on what work Awan did for her after he lost access to the House computer network.
She declined to answer questions about Awan in Washington on Wednesday, and her spokesman, David Damron, accompanied her to the House floor, instructing a reporter that Wasserman Schultz would not take questions about her former employee.
Wednesday evening, Wasserman Schultz released a statement:
"After details of the investigation were reviewed with us, my office was provided no evidence to indicate that laws had been broken, which over time, raised troubling concerns about due process, fair treatment and potential ethnic and religious profiling," she said. "Upon learning of his arrest, he was terminated."
Damron told the Miami Herald that Awan was still working for Wasserman Schultz in an advisory role until Monday, and was fired Tuesday. Wasserman Schultz was one of more than two dozen Democrats in Congress who employed Awan, 37, and four other information-technology staffers accused in February of stealing computer systems.
But months after Awan was fired by everyone else, Wasserman Schultz grilled Capitol Police Chief Matthew Verderosa in May over why computer equipment was confiscated from her office as part of the investigation into Awan even though she was not under investigation.
"Under my understanding the Capitol police are not able to confiscate member's equipment when the member is not under investigation," Wasserman Schultz said. "It is their equipment and it is supposed to be returned."
Subscribe
x
ADVERTISEMENT
BREAKING NEWS
Why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep paying tech expert suspected of stealing House computers?
By
Alex Leary | Times Washington bureau chief
Published July 26, 2017
The following is from the Miami Herald:
When a computer expert who worked for congressional Democrats was accused of stealing computers and data systems in February, members of Congress cut him loose within days, leaving Imran Awan with no supporters five months later.
Except for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The Weston Democrat has not explained why she continued to employ Awan until Tuesday, when she fired him — after he was arrested on bank-fraud charges at Dulles International Airport in Virginia attempting to board a flight to Pakistan.
Nor has she elaborated on what work Awan did for her after he lost access to the House computer network.
Cont.
Cont.
She declined to answer questions about Awan in Washington on Wednesday, and her spokesman, David Damron, accompanied her to the House floor, instructing a reporter that Wasserman Schultz would not take questions about her former employee.
Wednesday evening, Wasserman Schultz released a statement:
"After details of the investigation were reviewed with us, my office was provided no evidence to indicate that laws had been broken, which over time, raised troubling concerns about due process, fair treatment and potential ethnic and religious profiling," she said. "Upon learning of his arrest, he was terminated."
Damron told the Miami Herald that Awan was still working for Wasserman Schultz in an advisory role until Monday, and was fired Tuesday. Wasserman Schultz was one of more than two dozen Democrats in Congress who employed Awan, 37, and four other information-technology staffers accused in February of stealing computer systems.
But months after Awan was fired by everyone else, Wasserman Schultz grilled Capitol Police Chief Matthew Verderosa in May over why computer equipment was confiscated from her office as part of the investigation into Awan even though she was not under investigation.
"Under my understanding the Capitol police are not able to confiscate member's equipment when the member is not under investigation," Wasserman Schultz said. "It is their equipment and it is supposed to be returned."
Verderosa told Wasserman Schultz that he couldn't return the equipment without the permission of the investigation.
"Until that's accomplished I can't return the equipment," Verderosa said.
Wasserman Schultz was not pleased.
"I think you are violating rules when you conduct your business that way and you should expect that there will be consequences," she said.
The Capitol Police declined to comment on the investigation.
6:31
CORRUPT Debbie Wasserman Schultz THREATENS Police Chief
YouTube · TheDC Shorts
May 24, 2017
https://youtu.be/IAHGsyt2kZA?si=NuM__D18W5cTHkTu
>>613129
What about Awan.
Is Israel involved?
>>613193
We are saving Israel for last.
Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
Q
BRITISH ENGLISH
/ˈfaɡətri/
FAG-uh-tree
U.S. ENGLISH
/ˈfæɡətri/
FAG-uh-tree
Should be with Dopey
Laptap WILL boomerang SOON