Anonymous ID: 8dddea July 9, 2018, 9:49 p.m. No.2101993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2011 >>2020 >>2038

For over a year, many of us assumed that Justice Scalia was murdered by the Clintons and that the tarmac meeting was set up by Bill and Hillary Clinton to offer Loretta Lynch a seat of the Supreme Court in exchange for clearing the Hillary investigation. What if we ALL got this story wrong. What if Hussein had Justice Scalia killed and Hussein/Loretta Lynch were the ones who initiated the tarmac meeting by offering to kill the Hillary investigation in exchange for Loretta Lynch to have the SC seat? What if Bill, for insurance purposes just in case Hillary lost, was the one who recorded the meeting? What if this is the Raw HRC video that is toxic and impossible to defend? Q has said 'No Deals." But, last year, Q made it a point to let us know that "HRC tried to cut a deal. We said no." If Hillary had evidence that could lead to Hussein being exposed as a traitor, I doubt POTUS would turn it down. By now, everyone has seen the video of Bill and Hillary flying commercial without their security detail. Perhaps in exchange for testimony against Hussein and giving up all illegally obtained assets, they were both given a deal. This is just a thought.

Anonymous ID: 8dddea July 9, 2018, 9:57 p.m. No.2102074   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2102038

I just explained what they could offer. Raw recording of the tarmac meeting provided by Bill Clinton. Sure, I guess in theory the NSA could have listened into that meeting. But the NSA recordings couldn't be used in the court of law. Bill's recordings could.