>>21017353 (lb)
>Pretty sure everyone cannot hold every elected role simultaneously.
>Look into it, Marxist trash.
Kek. That's why we have the ADL, the WJC, the AJC, et al, right? So no group can have superiority of another.
I think you have me confused with someone else. I'm not the one elevating one sub-group of our species above others, due to religious ideology and then crying "anti-Semitisms" (tm) when people refuse to capitulate to my demands.
>>21017436 (lb)
>Funny, I see the largest source of that narrative is from satanist protecting shills and other religion haters, not the jews themselves.
Kek. Indeed. Wasn't it Garland who invoked the Lolocaust when he was being questioned during Congressional testimony. Wasn't it Blinken, who went Israel and "came to them as a Jew" invoking that muh "Oct 7th massacre" (tm) was a thousand 9-11s? Wasn't it Congressman Max Miller who belted out "we're the chosen ones!" at a Christian woman who spoke her religious beliefs, demanding she delete her poast on twitter? Wasn't this Christian woman later fired from her job and Miller's wife just happened to sit on the board that did the firing?
Yeah, it's never the Jews, Anon. /s Don't hate that I call a spade, a spade. Just means I have bigger minerals than you do.
>>21017639
Eisen, is that you? No, can't be. You're in a hearing. Liddle Adamths, is that you? Tell me moar about the Standard.
>Maybe poster(s) not realizing that when they don't change and don't learn, while everyone else changes and learns, the posting patterns become more and more recognizable as obvious as attempts to divide, blame innocent people, smear and slander Q, anons, board admins, deflect from the current news, all to push stupid cringe narratives that benefit only the cult?
>Just guessing…
Or it could be overly heavy-handed tactics by a "moderation team" which is something that's seen in every part of the interwebz. Occam's razor points the the fact that while that poast was not offensive, the (OP)didpoast something the "owners and/or volunteers" found offensive and rather than just deleting the offending poast, they decided to take that Anon's voice away completely. The irony is not lost on me. (picrel)
>Probably because it was part of a batch of your spew Vatican Dude
Kek. Need to work on that low-tier projection, "Anon." It doesn't suit you, nor does it benefit anyone.
>It's all Vatican Shill.
My point exactly. What a convenient excuse to mass ban "wrong think." It's all the same playbook, same with AEI, Gorefag, et al. They use the same tactics over and over again, minutely changing things, but expecting the same results. They're not used to the sheep refusing to follow orders and can't think outside the box. They're an easy read.
Firmed.