dChan
Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 5:12 p.m. No.21019161   🗄️.is 🔗kun

'' Fani Willis can get Trump's election racketeering case back on track: Ex-prosecutor ''

rawstory.com/trump-georgia-case-2668521322

 

Sarah K. Burris June 13, 2024

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - FEBRUARY 15: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis testifies during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse on February 15, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Judge Scott McAfee is hearing testimony as to whether Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade should be disqualified from the case for allegedly lying about a personal relationship. (Photo by Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)

Former federal and state prosecutor Glenn Kirschner said Thursday he believes the challenge to Fani Willis' prosecution of former President Donald Trump could very well fail after the Fulton County District Attorney filed a motion to dismiss.

 

Kirschner argued on his "Justice Matters" YouTube channel that a motion demanding Willis be removed from the Georgia election racketeering case is "not supported by the actual evidence they provided."

 

At issue is the claim that Willis' admitted relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, now recused from the case, created a conflict of interest in Trump's case.

 

Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee found in March that no such conflict of interest existed and Willis could move forward with the trial. Trump's team sought an appeal, and McAfee granted the request.

 

/Willis filed on Wednesday her own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 5:19 p.m. No.21019212   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21019205

 

'' Pentagon Seeks to Feed Troops ‘Experimental’ Lab-Grown Meat to Reduce CO2 Footprint ''

theleadingreport.com/pentagon-seeks-to-feed-troops-experimental-lab-grown-meat-to-reduce-co2-footprint

By Patrick WebbJune 13, 2024

The Pentagon has partnered with a company to explore feeding America’s soldiers lab-grown meat in an effort to reduce the carbon footprint at Defense Department outposts. BioMADE, a public-private company with over $500 million in funding from the Defense Department, announced earlier this month that it is seeking proposals for “innovations in food production that reduce the CO2 footprint of food production at … DoD operational environments,” according to an online announcement.

 

SLAMProjectCall-1Download

Among these innovations is the development of “novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat/protein,” or lab-grown meat. This type of meat is grown in a laboratory from animal cells using various chemicals and processes. While lab-grown meat remains in its experimental stages, it has become a focal point in discussions about the efficacy and ethics of producing meat without animal slaughter.

 

BioMADE—which received a $450 million infusion of taxpayer funds earlier this year—asserts that lab-grown food products will help the Pentagon achieve a reduced carbon footprint. This initiative aligns with the Biden administration’s mandate to address climate change and other cultural issues, which critics often label as “woke.”

 

“Innovations in food production that reduce the CO2 footprint of food production at and/or transport to DoD operational environments are solicited,” the company stated in an informational document and accompanying press release. The proposals could include the production of nutrient-dense military rations via fermentation processes, utilizing one carbon molecule (C1) feedstocks for food production, and novel cell culture methods for cultivated meat/protein.

 

Additionally, BioMADE is inviting proposals for processes that convert greenhouse gases and projects that develop bioproducts to mitigate environmental impacts both regionally and globally. These include bioproducts to prevent or slow coastal erosion.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 6:21 p.m. No.21019534   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9538

How the Obama-Biden Machine Intimidated Jews to Hate Trump

americanthinker.com/articles/2024/06/how_the_obama_biden_machine_intimidated_jews_to_hate_trump.html

June 13, 2024

 

By Leo Goldstein

How did Democrats convince so many Jews that Trump is racist and antisemite in 2017?

 

The Democrats have been calling Republicans racists and worse for decades, so mere propaganda could not have achieved that.

 

What I found in searching for the answer might also explain how anti-Trump sentiment spread over society, rising to the level of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

 

Start with the series of JCC threats.

 

Begining before Trump’s inauguration as 45th POTUS, hundreds of bomb threats were made against Jewish community centers and schools in the U.S.

 

The threats came in five waves: Jan. 9 (three days after the election's certification), Jan. 18 (two days before the inauguration), Jan. 31 (following the travel ban, fueling Big Tech-led insurrection), Feb. 20, and Feb. 28.

 

The media unanimously declared that these threats came from white supremacists in the U.S., allegedly emboldened by the election of President Trump.

 

The FBI knew that most of the threats were made over the Internet, could have been made from anywhere in the world, and likely came from abroad, but refused to say that officially. In hindsight, this can be linked to the agenda of FBI Director James Comey and his number two, Andrew McCabe. The agenda was to undermine the president whose election they had attempted to prevent and to hide how easy the Obama-Biden administration made it for foreign threat actors to obtain classified info and impact events in the U.S.

 

On March 23, the information about the perpetrator of most threats was published, refuting accusations against Trump and “white supremacists.” Almost all threats were made by an autistic 18-year-old, Michael Kadar, living in Israel. He was engaged in criminal activity online from his parents’ home. Among other things, he provided a “service” for making threats over the Internet. His claims of “boredom” as the motive are implausible, given that he did such things for money. Almost certainly, these threats were ordered by somebody who hated Trump.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 6:21 p.m. No.21019538   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9543

>>21019534

 

The perpetrator could not know the identities of those who ordered those threats (this is how Internet crime works), but the FBI could have found them in other ways.

 

A small number of threats in the last two waves were made by a leftist African American journalist, who said he was trying to frame his ex-girlfriend.

 

When it became clear that the evidence vindicated Trump, the subject disappeared from the media agenda. The public impression that it was Trump’s fault remained.

 

Then there was the attack on Rabbi Haskel Lookstein.

 

The internet and social media enabled a novel kind of attack on individuals by penetrating the small community of the target. Rabbi Lookstein was attacked this way in July 2016 when he accepted an invitation to speak at an RNC conference, which was to declare Donald Trump as the Republican candidate officially.

 

Rabbi Haskel Lookstein, then 84, was a rabbi of the modern orthodox congregation Kehilath Jeshurun and rabbi emeritus of the Ramaz School in New York. He was not political or partisan. He performed a public prayer for President Obama in 2009. That did not help him.

 

The attack was launched on July 14, 2016, by a petition posted on Change.org, titled Ramaz School: Rabbi Lookstein – You May Speak for Trump, But Not in Our Name. The petition regurgitated the Hillary campaign falsehood and propaganda points (“To embrace Trump and Trumpism goes against all we’ve been taught … his refusal to attend the NAACP convention…”). It was signed by one person, Jacob Savage, who claimed to be a former student of Ramaz school.

 

The petition invited signatures from people worldwide with any attitude toward Jews and the US but gained only 816 signatures. I found only one signer related to the Ramaz school community, an alumni named Yitz Landes. Yitz acknowledged that his politics are uncommon and even unacceptable in his circle: "At risk of alienating the few Facebook friends of mine who have not yet unfriended me because of my politics, I will say that Donald Trump is a horrible person.” He also published the target’s email: “If you'd like to email R. Lookstein, his email is RHL@ckj.org.” This is an invitation to harass the target, intentional or not. This attack also had offline components.

 

Consequently, R. Lookstein withdrew from the conference: “Like my father before me, I have never been involved in politics. Politics divides people.”

 

Of course, the public misinterpreted this as a repudiation of Trump. Democrat activists behind this attack learned that bullying works and escalated it against other targets. That evolved into the infamous “search and destroy” strategy against Trump’s appointees.

 

Now, it is clear that many people stayed away from the candidate and, later, President Trump because they did not want to be targeted by a Democrat-triggered mob. Others interpreted this avoidance as a sign of disapproval of Donald Trump or an indication that Trump had unknown defects. This weakened the Trump presidency and encouraged attacks from all sides, including federal government employees.

 

There also was an attack on Rabbi Marvin Hier.

 

Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, was one of the religious leaders invited to pray at Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017. He was the first rabbi to speak at a presidential inauguration since 1985. As soon as it became known that the invitation was extended, a vicious campaign was launched against him. On Jan. 3, 2017 (just before the certification session of the Congress), a petition popped up on Change.org, signed by someone named Mya Stark and “Movement for Accountability for the Trump Administration.” Despite the invitation extended to the whole world, it gained only 3,299 signers.

 

R. Hier refused to yield and rebuked some detractors, saying they acted as if elections were not over.

 

After that came intimidation by the ruling party.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 6:22 p.m. No.21019543   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21019538

 

In May 2016, Hillary Clinton said on national television: “I do not want Americans and, you know, good-thinking Republicans, as well as Democrats and independents, to start to believe that this [Trump] is a normal candidacy.” Hillary Clinton represented the incumbent party. Calling a presumptive candidate from the opposition this way is intimidation. This threat was aggravated by the conduct of the Obama-Biden administration, which had successfully used the IRS to persecute and destroy the Tea Party, jailed dissidents, suppressed opposition media, and created an atmosphere more like a totalitarian state than the U.S.

 

It was also a signal to the intelligence and national security community. Remember this Page–Strzok communication “she [Hillary Clinton] might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear…” This was February 2016, long before Obama’s FBI targeted the Trump campaign. After that, Hillary’s chances skyrocketed. In October 2016, some bookmakers paid out gamblers who bet on her victory.

 

Later calls against “normalizing Trump” were just references to that speech and veiled threats, not always intentional. I think that this intimidation campaign caused the Republican Jewish Coalition not to endorse Trump in 2016. Most RJC directors were businessmen, vulnerable to vindictive “regulation” expected from a Hillary administration. Such intimidation was unprecedented, and yielding to it was likely misinterpreted as a denunciation of Trump.

 

The role of social media, this kingdom of crooked mirrors, is out of scope.

 

To conclude:

 

The Obama-Biden administration and the Democrat campaign have intimidated prominent Jews against supporting and even associating with Donald Trump in 2016-2017. Because such intimidation had no precedent in this country, their silence was perceived as agreement with a vocal minority of Trump haters.

 

Trump was also wrongly blamed for threats against Jewish community centers, which started under the outgoing Obama-Biden administration, were likely ordered by someone associated with it, and abetted by its holdovers.

 

P.S.: Microsoft Copilot AI assistant refused to assist with this text because of its content.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 6:23 p.m. No.21019550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9559

Sorry, Nancy, Trump had no role in inciting the J6 riot

americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/sorry_nancy_trump_had_no_role_in_inciting_the_j6_riot.html

June 13, 2024

 

By Jack Cashill

“The president of the United States, the former president and his toadies, do not want to face the facts,” said an embarrassed Nancy Pelosi after a video surfaced of her saying, “We take responsibility” for the breakdown of order on January 6.

 

“They are trying to do revisionist history on January 6,” Pelosi continued, “but we cannot let us be dragged into their again [sic] false impression about what happened that day. They know what happened that day.”

 

Unfortunately, many conservatives in the media and in government do not know what happened that day. Unlike Pelosi and her cabal mates, however, they are at least trying to get at the truth. As I explain in detail in Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6, a useful place to begin is the timeline of events. A quick review reveals an exculpatory fact so obvious and so powerful that it is astonishing that no one seems to have noticed.

 

On January 5, Trump posted on Facebook, “I will be speaking at the SAVE AMERICA RALLY tomorrow on the Ellipse at 11AM Eastern. Arrive early—doors open at 7AM Eastern. BIG CROWDS!” For no reason I could discover, Trump started his speech an hour late. Had he started on time, audience members would have flooded onto the Capitol grounds just about 1 P.M. — just when the conspirators, friend and/or foe, were expecting them.

 

One o’clock P.M. seems to have been the witching hour. At about 12:40 P.M., a woman spotted a six-inch pipe bomb as she walked down an alley near the RNC headquarters in Washington. The timer appeared to be set for the bomb to explode in twenty minutes, at 1 P.M.

Anonymous ID: 546e8f June 13, 2024, 6:23 p.m. No.21019559   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21019550

 

At 1 P.M., Vice President Mike Pence convened a joint session to certify the electoral votes. Minutes after 1 P.M., an undercover USCP officer spotted an apparent bomb sitting conspicuously in a bush next to a park bench outside the DNC.

 

At 1:06, while Rep. Paul Gosar was challenging the certification of the Arizona vote, Capitol Police deputy chief Eric Waldow ordered the “less lethal” team to begin shooting a barrage of grenades, gas, and rubber bullets into the still peaceful protesters now numbering about a thousand on the Capitol’s west side.

 

In violation of all norms, the police were shooting at head level. This bizarrely unprofessional attack helped enrage the crowd and likely killed one of them, Kevin Greeson. Greeson suffered a fatal heart attack when a flash bang exploded feet away. A body cam captured one officer lamenting, “We can hit them with a lot of pain compliance, but we’re hitting innocent people. We’re taking out one and getting ten angrier.”

 

Trump has been accused of provoking the riot by telling his supporters during his speech on the Ellipse, “And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” One problem with his charge, a rather large one: Trump made this statement at approximately 1:10 P.M. The Ellipse is roughly a 45-minute walk from the Capitol.

 

The late Ashli Babbitt stayed until the end of Trump’s speech. At 2:00 P.M., a protester behind Ashli just happened to take a perfectly framed photo of her as she approached the Capitol, her Trump 2020 flag worn cape-like over her shoulders, her uncapped hair flowing down her back. Had Trump not delayed his speech, Ashli and thousands of others would have arrived just when they would have done the conspirators the most good.

 

At 1:38, Trump tweeted, “Please support our local police and law enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful.” At 1:49, a “riot” was declared. Those who stayed to the end of Trump’s speech, as Ashli Babbitt did, would not yet have arrived at the Capitol.

 

At 1:59, on the east side of the Capitol, demonstrators overwhelmed the police by their sheer mass and made their way to the east steps. When the police retreated into the building, the crowd followed. At 2:10, protesters/provocateurs managed to get by the police on the west side of the Capitol and began breaking windows.

 

At 2:12, Ray Epps texted his nephew boasting that he had “orchestrated” events at the Capitol. He certainly did his fair share. At 2:13, Trump tweeted, “I am asking for everyone at the Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember WE are the party of law and order.” In truth, Trump had no effective way of communicating with the crowd, most of whom had no cell coverage and no leisure to check their tweets.

 

At 4:17 P.M., Trump said on a posted video, “You have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt.” Ashli Babbitt had been shot and killed more than an hour earlier. Rosanne Boyland was still alive, but she never did get to hear Trump’s plea.

 

Big Tech saw to that. Twitter promptly applied a warning label, saying, “The claim of election fraud is disputed, and this tweet can’t be replied to, Retweeted, or liked due to a risk of violence.” Facebook blocked the post as well.

 

No, Nancy, the Capitol was your responsibility. It is hard to tell where incompetence leaves off and conspiracy begins, but you’re not going to find the answer if you don’t look.

 

Jack Cashill’s new book, Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6, is now available for purchase.