>>2102410
Furthermore, the site hosting the Cathy O'Brien CP is an exposé sorta thing trying to get her story out and the people responsible (such as the clintons, bushes, cheneys, etc) to be brought to justice.
So again, I ask...
Under what conditions does everyone brought this stuff up to their attention? How?
This is correct.
There are no sex acts being committed.
The posing might be considered sexual, but it's also statuesque-ragdoll in a sense.
It's a study of the nubile form.
But then the next question would have to do with:
What's in the rest of the book?
Is it just nude studies or is there sexuality?
For example, was this the "tamest" image in the book and that's why wikimedia went with it?
Or is it possibly the most controversial and attention grabbing?
Where is and what's in that book?
Also imagine there's valid context for posting it in the first place.
The irony here is Project/Operation Paperclip.
Those fuckers did move into seats of power all over the world.
And here's a thought.
Was Soros part of Paperclip?
Also… if he was the only want who was secreted away to join the Nazis, gleefully, then how did his brother, who died in 2013, survive if his family was dun got?
Shit doesn't add up.
Well, anon, at some point (You) are going to have to stop sexualizing every butt nekked child you see.
Kids run around naked.
It's just what they do.
Puberty changes things, but, for example, why are there bikinis for little, little girls?
At that age the only difference is downstairs… so what's being hidden that isn't being hidden on the boys?
Why draw their attention to it?
Broski…
All you're doing is presenting the other side of the cold war propaganda.
A: That was the point of the Berlin wall.
"You look over there for Nazi tech, we look over here."
The people didn't fucking matter.
B: Both sides claimed to have gotten the best scientists.
However… how many of them were put into positions of power in the USSR?
Professional artist.
You have no idea how many naked kids there are an art text book.
Want me to trigger you?
OH FUCK!
MORE CHEESE PIZZA ON WIKIPEDIA!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Madonna_of_the_Cherubim
Why would scientists be running the Federal Reserver?
Think more….
IG Farben… Bayer… Monsanto….
and Josef Mengele.
We're talking about separate affairs and I'm not arguing against your point.
We're all faggots here, anon.
Also, would you prefer early photography?
Looooooots of naked kids there, too.
What about old school family photos of a kid at the lake running around naked?
Wasn't the guy who wrote Alice in Wonderland a pedophile who'd make photographs, drawings, and paintings of kids?
Lewis Carroll.
Should I find it for you or would you bitch at me for posting CP? ;)
No, my point is that YOU need to stop sexualizing children.
It's either him or E.B. White.
Should I be afraid to look to verify?
They show that shit in art school, let alone some high school art classes.
:P
Again, I'm not arguing what you're saying.
Nazi scientist who pioneered the MK Ultra program didn't go on to run the banks, media, and other well known jewish run industries.
We get it.
Calm your fucking tits.
I'm fine with creating a pedo island and then sinking said pedo island.
Know too many gaybros to get behindja on thinkin' butt stuff is icky and offensive, though.
(Phrasing. LET IT RIDE!)
It was Carroll doing pedo stuff.
Sometimes he'd colorize them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Carroll#/media/File:Alice_Liddell_2.jpg
Yeah, that's the same principle as:
"Why are we sexualizing very little girls by putting bikinis on them?".
Mmmm…
Honestly?
That's what I'm talking about.
If a kid is running around naked around me…
Do you know how many shits I give?
Zero.
You know why?
Cuz it's a fuckin' kid.
It's what they do.
The issue here is your sexualizing all instances of kids runnin' 'round nekked.
Hey Parentanons… care to weigh in?
Ooooooh… actually…
Hey Boomer anons…
Do you remember how back in the 60's, 70's, and 80's it was perfectly normally to have photos of your kids in the bath tub or at a lake or somewhere and they'd just happen to be naked?
Remember when people started getting turned into the cops for having family photos of their own kids and they were butt ass nekked in the photo because they're kids and not sex objects?
And then… well now we're at the point where even a picture of a newborn, who are not born with clothes, is considered CP.
Y'all need to consider that it's not the child being naked.
It IS the perverse and fucked up thoughts of those individuals who have them.
The liberal solution was to turn kids into drag queens so that they at least still had clothes on while you ask a fucking baby for god damn consent to change their diaper.
The real solution is:
QUIT SEXUALIZING CHILDREN IN THE FUCKING FIRST PLACE.
People who aren't putting thoughts of shame into their kids, but I'm talking about decades ago and…
Literally almost any beach in Europe.
And all over Japan and China and… well asia in general.
Oooooh… ooooh… and Africa.
I know, I know, they fuck babies to cure their AIDS.
Stupidity aside… the the view of "naughtiness" that gets introduced.
Yes, teach the kids to cover themselves.
No, we have no been in a time or environment where kids running around nekked has been acceptable for… what… about 30 years or so?
I don't want to call us Puritans, but…
The kids in America are oversexualized.
Intentionally so.
By fucks like Schneider(man?) at Nickelodeon and Harvey Weinstein and all those other media fucks, let alone Conde Naste and Soros media?
They actively hypersexualize children and pump that into society.
The push for Islam?
It's also a push for pedophilia.
by "we don't live in a time…" I meant Americans.
Until we completely destroy the cycle of preying on children until they turn into the next generation of pedofucks…
There does need to be a way for these people to seek help and learn that this world is about Love and not preying on or sexualizing the little ones.
Kinda like we do with the suicide hotline…
Albeit there should never be a Kevorkian version of pedophilia.
And just a follow up…
MORE ON LEWIS CARROLL, AUTHOR OF ALICE IN WONDERLAND, BEING A PEDOPHILE AND CREATING CP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Carroll#Discussion_of_Dodgson's_sexuality
That's as far as I'm going into it.
You have fun looking up "Lewis Carroll Pedophilia and Child Pornography".
You go right ahead, anon.
I think you're confusing me with someone else.
I'm the one who's fine with making a pedo island and then immediately sinking said pedo island, but I'm not against the gaybros fucking man butts.
I already provided sawce for you to dig.
I went over this stuff in undergrad.
Dig or be whining, lazy bitch.
The choice is yours.
Honeypot for what?
Showing you that the author of Alice in Wonderland was a known pedophile?
How does that make me glow?
Are you suddenly unaware of Alice in Wonderland's relationship with MK Ultra?
Really, faggot?
Friendly fire on my part, then.
I vote we lure them in with those child sex bots they've been making…
Literally every child sexbot on the planet.
Sink those with the pedophiles.
Fuckin' lofi hip-hop for the win!
Aight, and every other cherubim depicted in that time period?
Also, yes, you are correct on that.
Flucking sexists.
What's the opposite of a Perfect Golden Phi Spiral?
Probably a fucked up Blue one.
How many points does a curvilenear spiral hit along its path? All of them.
How about a Triangular one?
123123123….
Why pervert this?
As an aversion to you looking into it.
Oh, they like sacred geometry and a triangular spiral involves the least amount of points necessary to create a spiral form…
The pyramid and all seeing eye are like triangles and TPTB have it all over their shit…
And the GAYS like triangles…
Fuck Triangles and Spirals. They're all evil.
And then you live in fear of the meanings, symbolism, and perspectives they placed on things.
You know, like an innocent child thoughtlessly derping around with no pants one without a care in the world.
Just because they sexualize children, doesn't mean anyone else has to.
No lewding the ponies.
The point of that statement is…
It's an innocent thing.
Just let it be an innocent thing.
Fine, how about that entire South Park episode sexualizing Yo Gabba Gabba.
No Yo-ing the Gabbas.
Better?
Why wouldn't he?
Also… what kind of security detail does one or the other have?
Maybe it's a mutually beneficial thing since they're both targets considering everything Giuliani's been forced to watch the Bush and Clinton crime families do?
It's like they have something in common…
Doesn't need to be, is the answer that immediately comes to mind.
Also, flaunt 'em if you got 'em.
Like the servers.
Metadubz point to yes!