>supports pig on here.
>so, who wrote, and or is produce(ing) this movie we are watching?
https://qalerts.net/?q=less+than+10
Start with the oldest.
>That's not a new one tho.
“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Revelation-2-9/
What if a cool cat raised pigs, man? What would (You) call him?
>Farmer Cat, man.
A ranch is not a farm, brother. This cat was a pig rancher. Big time. Knew how to breed them. Spied for America in the 'Nam, man. Earned the nickname 'Mr. Pig' along with White Feather, fighting 'The Apache' in The Arizona along with the 2/5. That's 'The Pig' I know.
> White Feather, or was that someone else?
https://sdi.edu/historys-greatest-marksmen-carlos-white-feather-hathcock/
> 'The Apache'
[picrel]
https://cherrieswriter.com/2021/06/06/who-was-known-as-apache/
>Is Mr. Pig's background known by the shills? Is that why they hound him so?
Affirmative. Mr. Pig is an American Hero.
>>21029857
>Mr. Pig is an American Hero.
Who braved wily, winsome, dedicated Tagalog-speaking fierce enemy agents on your behalf, alongside Manila John?
Mr Pig did. That's who.
>mr pig is a famefag
>Mr. Pig is my kinda famefag.
>>21029930
>Q said everyone is safe.
Q was playing the averages, Anon. Like a politician:
How does the AVERAGE person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
>We are Pig Shift.
It's like when we were in-country in the 'Nam for a few years, but Mr .Pig was in-continent the whole time, man.
Pig Shift is a brotherhood.