Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:19 a.m. No.21030812   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0816 >>0841 >>0844

I see that once again the shill-bot depravity is flooding the bread with disgusting images.

images 'off'

if they have a message it's just hate.

they are only here to drive people away from the board.

there ought to be a way to say ' only one of these images per bread'.

it's not like image matching is that difficult with software, we simply shouldn't have to put up with this.

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:22 a.m. No.21030818   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21030809

here is another list: what this agreement really tries to do:

 

loot and deplete the resources of the United States to continue the constant hedgemony of war-mongering Ukrainan descent cabal and their minions who rule in so many nations.

assure that Democrats get kickbacks from this looting for the next ten years.

keep a steady supply of fresh organs to sell to the highest bidders.

keep the black mail material from becomeing public

try to start another war to make it easier to steal election.

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:31 a.m. No.21030851   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0857

>>21030844

you post the puny spineless stuff.

I merely point out that it's puny and spineless.

there is no message you have except for conflict and insults.

you're a pointless polemicist with no message who likes to spit in people's faces.

and you think there is an issue with me?

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:36 a.m. No.21030861   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21030857

I can handle it fine.

filter and speak up.

why does that bother you?

it's like if you had your air conditioner set too low and someone comes by and says 'wow it's chilly in here'

do you call them weak, and insult them with racial slurs?

I can hear you "FU , grand man, you weak old hag"

do you do that?

why do it to me?

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:45 a.m. No.21030888   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"US to send more food aid to Sudan, warning of a risk of historic famine"

https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20240615-us-to-send-more-food-aid-to-sudan-warning-of-a-risk-of-historic-famine

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 4:48 a.m. No.21030903   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0913

"Alleged robber ran over by driver in Upper Marlboro: police"

https://www.fox5dc.com/news/alleged-robber-ran-over-driver-upper-marlboro-police

Anonymous ID: fcb9f4 June 16, 2024, 5:06 a.m. No.21030958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21030937

in many cases that phrase made perfect sense.

the 'jobs' were make work, the work done was useless.

the jobs funded a lot of useless overhead, countless managers and overseers who often did nothing. The money was actually spent on something else.

the few who were hired as 'crews' were often contractors doing all the work.

in many cases the stuff they did was useless, for example 'dark fiber': where miles and miles of fiber were hung never to be lighted or used for communications. or other such projects.

so the workers, who were day-job people, knew this all instinctivly. They knew that it was just about billing for work that perhaps was never going to get done, and there would never be an audit, and no one would ever be called to task for it being shoddy and not completed correctly. And no one would be harmed by it not being done 'to spec'.

and in many cases the work never even got done but was billed anyway.

so the term 'good enough for government work' made perfect sense.

why should the contractors who rebilled the work be the only ones to have an easy time?

many contractors would bid as many contracts as they knew how to bid and then, if they won, they'd get the list of all the other bidders and subcontract one of them to do the actual work.

 

perfect as we can make it?

perfect would be if the contracts were never put out to bid and none of the work was ever billed: like those 'charging stations'.

it's perfect that they don't get built.

inperfect that they are billed anyway, is my guess.