Godspeed, Baker! o7
Godspeed, Fren. o7
Kek. That's big dig energy there, Anon. I thought I was banging using two tabs on a non-descript PC running a greasemonkey script to click between the two tabs every second, so I can catch everything they're deleting. I should probably just start scraping the breads like OldAnon did back in the day.
Chuck Schumer is such a fucking pathetic lifeform.
>kek, anon that was a play on your words
Well played, Sir! I love Dad Jokes. You got me on that one. Flew right past my head.
>there are those who run hate-bot scripts
And you know this how, Anon? Applying Occam's Razor says you're either running the bots or you're in charge of the people running the bots. I don't buy the "severe shilling" bullshit narrative. I've witnessed the mass deletions when Anons were shit poasting during a lull digs or notable info.
>and that runs all day, all night, in a constant torrent of obvious fakeness.
That's projection, Anon. Just 'cos you consider something "fake," doesn't mean it is. Not everyone is going to be beholden to the dogma you follow.
>and if the stuff wasn't deleted there would be few people able to scroll through it all and there would be three times as many breads.
There's few people aready, Anon. Interesting you're acting like this place is as active as it was back in 2019. You know, before the new "BO" took over?
Yeah, I never went along with that shit. You talk about muh "transparency" but then say "the majority of it must remain hidden, for the betterment of humanity."
No, Q, that allows the cancer to still fester. Clearly Q doesn't get how Chaos actually works.
It's comms, Anon. 6 hot dogs. 6 hamburger patties. Still following? How many letters are in the word "cheese."
6.
>idiots who fight "Q"
Who said anything about "fighting Q?" I'm not okay with a 60/40 split. It's all or nothing, for me. Are you saying I'm not allowed to have such an opinion?
>go back to AJ
Projection.
>Also you are frauds.
Again, projection.
>Actual anons know "Q is not a perdon.
Da fuq is a "perdon?"
>so fuck right off.
Have some tits, Broke Dick.
>so is he a white jewish guy? he is jewish but identifies as white?
You should watch this, Anon. Godspeed. o7
You're the one who went immediately to ad hominem, not me. I was merely having a debate. Go back to the minors, Kid. The adults are talking.
Projection. I merely voiced my opinion. It's all or nothing, for me. And when Americans find out the truth of how 9-11 was orchestrated, well, you know what's coming… and you know nothing can stop it.
>They should run AOC
No. She has to end up on OnlyFans. Only then will the AOC circle be complete.
Just making observations, Anon. Remember, they put fucking comms in everything. It's Schumer, though, so I'm always noticing.
I watched this yesterday. He threw out a lot of symbolism. I remember when he "became" Jewish again, after he got married and had kids. Before that, he was an "atheist." Always the same playbook. A shame, 'cos my sons and I love Brutal Legend. We still play it.
>Anyone who knows their history knows that Jacob and Esau
You're still brian-washed, Anon, as you're collectively sperging the Abrahamic dogma. It's just another form of control. They lied about history. You think they haven't been lying about religion?
>The fact that God offends you, says it all.
Not everyone believes what you do, Anon. You have the right to your beliefs, but the belief, itself, commands no respect. I don't know what this concept is so hard to grasp for you Abrahamics.
>Wake up
Projection.
> Or go find a safe space for your bias.
Wow. How kosher of you. I love it when you religious types start throwing around your "or else" narratives.
>Go lick your brothers taint you sodomizing scrotum sucker.
Interesting rebuttal to my question. I'll ask again. They lied about history. You think they're not lying about religion?
Kek
>Who is, "they?"
Who indeed, Anon. Who indeed. What kind of person would lie about something for their benefit.
>Humans vs Jews
Kek. They openly admit it, but if you point it out, you're an "anti-Semite" (tm).
>yes.
>Truth.
All animals are equal, but some animals aremore equalthan others. Shit is going to hit the fan in the next couple of months.
>Just about anyone would lie if the benefit were big enough.
That's deflection, Anon and I sourced the big man, themself. Who would lie about Hitler, Anon? What would be the benefit? Especially if he were a "puppet." If "they" lied about that, what makes you think they wouldn't lie about religion or their "place" in it?
>Pretty sure the papacy was behind Hitler and quite a few other things as well throughout history.
Kek. Indeed.
>see how all these personas attack me for merely describing what goes on here?
Kek. How is asking you questions, you refused to answer and pointing out the blatantly obvious flaws in your logic, "attacking you?" I made astute observations. Care to comment on any of them or are you going to continue with your "victimhood" (tm) narrative?
>besides Muslims and Jews, who has it written into their sacred texts that it is both ethical and expected to lie cheat and steel for those outside your group?
>If you want me to trust a group that has bylaws that tell them they can cheat me with impunity, you are ripe for whatever they decide to do to you.
Judaism, Islam and Christianity all come from the same branch of ideology, Anon.
>I acknowledge that there are some bad corrupt Jews, just like every single ethic group on this planet, so why do you fixate on just one particular one?
Why do you fixate on protecting just one particular one?
>what do you mean by 'ideology'?
All religion is is idelism.
>with Muslims it is convert or be a second class citizen, or convert or die.
>please do not slander Christians in this way
"Slander." Interesting choice of words there. "Convert or die." Another interesting choice of words. (picrel)
Don't throw stones in glass houses.