I think you got the dates wrong.
didn't Q move in January of 2018?
no fencing is being put up around . . .
that's kind of an odd headline.
no fencing is being put up around tons and tons of various locations.
so why is it news that no fencing is being put up around the Supreme Court?
or did they mean 'new fencing?'
that is a strange notable.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/17/us/robert-morris-gateway-church-sexual-abuse-allegations/index.html
in the 1980s a mega church pastor did something wicked
via drudge
weird how we have 'vatican shill' but no 'mega-church shlll'
can next baker check the notable that says 'no fence being built around the supreme court and decide if it should be 'new fence being built'?
see: >>21042160
I'm reading a book and the protestant pastor who wrote it takes Martin Luthor's objections against the Vatican and rewrites it for the mega-churches using things that the pastor sees are just as the Vatican did circa 1500AD but for American mega-churches of the 1980s.
red text shill is an easy filter
OK so this guys says 'there are no riot fences at the Supreme Court' right now, so the notable, though confusing, is correct.
your link and the other link have no images of fences.
the video someone else posted is him there narrating with a camera and showing bike racks which he says are 'there all the time'.
so "no fences being constructed around the Supreme Court" is a correct headline as far as all of the information we have here today shows.
if there were fences there would be pictures of fences.
there is no argument going on between us
me too, anon. I'm not arguing either.
but you seem rather touchy
and this one tries to start trouble
the conflict mongerers here can't help it.
everyone who isn't in their gang is accused of causing problems
anyone else who contributes is accused of being 'hurt' or 'crying'
and they gang up on those who debunk their falsity.
he's not arguing but he is giving out fake information.
they seem to have agendas.
and they message back and forth with their glowing morning greetings.
yesterday they did the 'evil baker makes threats' bit all day.
it's gotten to the point where they are obvious and filtering them does seem like the only solution.
here we have it: they want anyone not in their
government mongering crew to get the F out.
they have done their best to make this an unfriendly place.
your team is so obvious.
one posts bogus information and I investigate the links and discover that they show nothing that indicates that the head lines are correct, I post it, and then I get the pig-pile crew attacking me.
and then you with the Gapping Manhole acronym
Do you know how long I had that one in the chamber and never used it?
come on, it's describes it perfectly.
the 'you are not OK' tactic.
anon, I'm fine.
you pretending that I need to take it easy?
that's what you do. you try to make others feel uncomfortable.
but your fine because you're on your script.
stop doing a fake diagnosis of other people's mental state, anon, can you?