Anonymous ID: 62028b June 18, 2024, 5:31 p.m. No.21046762   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6770

>>21046714

Within the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) the use of the atomic bomb was also cause for debate, in part, because the Foundation played a role in its creation. Indeed, distinguished physicist Dr. Ernest O. Lawrence would go so far as to tell RF President Raymond Fosdick โ€œthat if it hadnโ€™t been for the RF, there would have been no atomic bomb.โ€Show Citation 22 Although he meant it as a statement of gratitude for RF support, the idea that they shared some responsibility for the bombโ€™s creation was deeply unsettling to many within the Foundation.

Anonymous ID: 62028b June 18, 2024, 5:49 p.m. No.21046870   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21046802

There's always a market for the next best thing

What does the mic have in store next

Only happy when bombs are dropping

but if you don't have a population to drop them on due to a nukyular going offโ€ฆhow you going to do trick #2?

What sort of goodies are in store for the next round?

Ukraine? Precipice? stop the Russians at all costs? Have the Roths ever fully delivered on their promise to do away with the Romanovs? Are those funds still out there awaiting retrieval/liberation?