Anonymous ID: 152a20 June 19, 2024, 4:20 a.m. No.21049150   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9162

>>21049087 lb

Probably don't…but here's a research paper on the subject…like to read it…link below

 

and who got a mention in there

W.E.B. DuBois

 

https://corruptionchronicle.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-tulsa-race-riot-cover-up.html

Anonymous ID: 152a20 June 19, 2024, 4:28 a.m. No.21049170   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Kansas Sues Pfizer, Says Company 'Misled' Public On COVID-19 Vaccine

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/kansas-sues-pfizer-says-company-misled-public-covid-19-vaccine

 

Pfizer, for instance, said on April 1, 2021, that there were “no serious safety concerns through up to six months following second dose” of the vaccine it makes with Germany’s BioNTech, the lawsuit notes.

 

But documents made public through a lawsuit showed that Pfizer’s adverse events database, which includes reported issues following vaccination from around the world, already contained 158,893 adverse events as of Feb. 28, 2021.

 

“Pfizer’s representations that its COVID-19 vaccine did not have any safety concerns was inconsistent with the adverse events data it possessed,” the suit, filed by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach states. “Pfizer concealed, suppressed, or omitted material facts it possessed showing significant safety concerns associated with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.”

 

The suit also highlights how Pfizer in the same press release said that vaccinated trial participants enjoyed 91.3 percent protection against COVID-19 up to six months after a second dose.

 

Documents released later, though, showed that Pfizer recorded 83.7 percent effectiveness among trial participants at four months after a second dose, while finding indications in blood samples that effectiveness was waning even more at six months.