tyb
o7
ARCHIVNG - NIGEL FARAGE HOLDS A RALLY IN BLACKPOOL WITH JUST 48 HOURS NOTICE - 20TH JUNE 2024 !!!
Note: The bbc is having a leaders debate tonight and they have not invited reform u.k leader, the leaders, rishi, starmer, ed and the sdm leader, face the brainwashed audience of the bbc one at a time to answer the selected question from the audience.
rally runtime is 1hr 13 minutes, first speaker takes the stage at 12 minutes, 2nd speaker takes the stage at 16 minutes and farage takes the stage at 21 minutes.
this rally will get moar view than the leaders debate on the bbc.
watch it go viral.
---
LIVE: Only FARAGE can stop the boats.
https://youtu.be/Kw7HZe2ZfoE
-------
Only Reform UK has a plan to freeze immigration.
--–
notes from nigel's rally in blackpool.
nigel : the polls are out of date.
nigel: the betting scandel.
nigel: how many perverts have they had to kick out over the years. tories.
nigel: hits out on lockdown, masks, lies.
nigel : the national debt. we are broke.90 billion per year in interest alone.
nigel: immigration election the boats is now a invasion.
nigel: we should be declaring this a national security emergency
ARCHIVING - ANDREW BRIDGEN EXPOSES EVERYTHING FROM NOW THE ELECTIONS ARE UNDER WAY - 20TH JUNE 2024 !!!
Note: He exposes that the u.k is already at war with russia, the vaccines, he is jabbed twice and damaged by the second vaccine, he was asked if he was going to commit suicide, lost his wife, still watching but absolutely explosive interview. will add further notes runtime 2hr 5 minutes.
==
ANDREW BRIDGEN BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW l Resistance Podcast #6 with Andrew Bridgen
https://youtu.be/pidSG5nMkW8
---–
13,036 views Premiered 10 hours ago
Resistance GB journalist Will Coleshill speaks in a special episode of The Resistance Podcast with Andrew Bridgen, MP for Northwest Leicestershire until the present election and now independent candidate.
>>21058934 ←if only you knew how bad things really are…
COMEY ON TRUMP, GREG KELLY BELIEVES THEY WILL SEND TRUMP TO JAIL
Note: This is now a real and present danger.
==
Greg Kelly predicts that Judge Merchan will put Trump behind bars
https://youtu.be/tBux10xgQDE
MARK STEYN EXPLAINS WHY NIGEL FARAGE DID NOT GET TO BE ON THE BBC LEADERS DEBATE - OFCOM AKA THE QUANGO OR THE REGULATOR OF TRUTH !!!
Note: Reform u.k mentioned in their contract with the people about quango's but when pressed by the media none of their members could name even one of them.
Well OFCOM is shutting down free speech, OFGEM is controlling energy, and OBR is controlling the money for the Bank of England, these 3 are the biggest with 1000's moar on top of government departments which are hamstrung due to regulators.
The top of the pyrimad is the B.I.S which is the regulator for the central banks.
This is how things work or stopped from working, put in place by Tony Blair and co at the W.E.F around the globe.
p.s continued in next comment post.
==
I'm still recuperating from my courthouse exertions in London last week. However, a couple of thoughts on the passing parade:
~As I first wrote over two decades ago, Islamic supremacism attaches great importance to the annexation of the public space. To mark the Canadian centennial of 1967, half of Dominion Square in Montreal was renamed Place du Canada. Half-a-century later, during a Defund-the-Police protest, the magnificent statue of Sir John A Macdonald was toppled and decapitated, and the craven city council decided he would not be returned to his pride of place.
But these are mere poseur flourishes. (Pierre) Trudeaupian nationalism is dead, and the "anti-colonialist" nihilism that supplanted it is a mere death-spasm of demographically irrelevant western youth. Like the man said all those years ago, the future belongs to Islam. Bottoms up:
Welcome to Canada 🇨🇦 This morning at Place du Canada in Montreal
🎥 @guillaum3roy http://pic.twitter.com/yJlHuQiSNl
— Melissa 🇨🇦 (@Melissalmrogers) June 16, 2024
~This headline caught my eye:
U.S. Justice: the Strange Cases of President Donald Trump & Mark Steyn
I'm flattered, but, in fairness - looking at, say, proposed Congressional legislation to withdraw Secret Service protection from Trump - I don't think I'm up against the same implacable urge actually to kill me. Then again, who can say? I have no particular desire to end up as merely the latest "justifiable homicide", like the unfortunate Executive Director of the Bill and Hillary Clinton International Airport.
In any event, the above turned out to be the title of a lecture at the Danube Institute in Budapest by James Allan, law professor at the University of Queensland. If the video gets posted, we'll certainly link to it. However, Professor Allan did give an interview on both trials to The Hungarian Conservative.
What all these cases have in common - Giuliani, Navarro, Bannon, Flynn, the J6 grandmas, etc - is the determination to inflict utter ruin. And thereby render politics, as that term is understood in civilised societies, entirely impossible.
So yet again, by pretending that anything approaching the necessary conditions for politics currently exist in the United States, Conservative Inc and the butch boys with the butch bumper music are merely deluding their followers.
~Why do I think the UK state censor Ofcom should be put out of business? Because there are very few areas of British life that this strange, secretive body does not "regulate". Take, for example, this current UK election campaign, which the media are keen to keep as a torpid Potemkin struggle between TweedleLeft and TweedleRight. So, on Thursday night, BBC bigshot Fiona Bruce will host a debate between the four party leaders - that's to say, the head honchos of the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens.
Wait a minute: what about Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform party? Since the beginning of the year, Reform has been third-placed in the polls, ahead of the LibDems and Greens, and last week they rose to second place ahead of the unlovely Tories.
continued
continued
So why wouldn't the second-place party get a spot in the leaders' telly debate?
Ah, well, you're looking at it all wrong, you hick. Here's how the Beeb explain it:
The Ofcom guidance gives 'greater weight on the actual performance of a political party in elections over opinion poll data' taking into account the 'greater uncertainty associated with support in opinion polls'.
The "actual performance of a political party" refers to their results in the two previous elections - 2019 and 2015 - when Reform didn't exist. A lot of other things didn't exist in 2015: Brexit, Covid, lockdown, the Ukraine war, legions of vaccine victims, the massed ranks of Albanian males occupying English country-house hotels…
But, per "Ofcom guidance", Campaign 2024 has to be conducted on the basis of how things stood a decade ago.
You know who would also be ineligible to participate under Ofcom's rules? Everyone's favourite Lana Turner sweater-girl in Kiev, Volodymyr Zelenskyyyyy. He only formed his Servant of the People party in late 2017, so no election debates for you, sweater-girl. And don't try blaming it on Putin, because it's "Ofcom guidance" so we all know it's on the up-and-up.
Because, as their barrister assured the High Court, Ofcom are "expert regulators". Lord Grade and Dame Melanie Dawes probably did a module in regulation at Rotherham Polytechnic or whatever.
I can see why the likes of Naomi Wolf's creepy stalker-boy Matthew Sweet like this system: it's a club and they get to decide who's admitted. It's less obvious why the generality of the citizenry put up with it. At any rate, get set for another thrilling BBC election debate in which all four "opponents" agree on Covid, climate, Ukraine, the joys of mass Muslim immigration and the inviolability of the NHS …but ever more furiously denounce each other for not tossing enough money that doesn't exist into the sinkhole.
Don't get me wrong, I quite like that pixie Green leader who describes herself as a "pansexual vegan", and I certainly don't have the personal baggage with her that I have with Nige. But under what rational conception of media "regulation" does the six per cent basement-dweller get guaranteed a seat at the table but not Reform?
And you wonder why nothing changes?
~Further to my own case against Ofcom, here are a couple of rounds-up worth noting. If you live in one of those countries where one is permitted to access Rumble, Hearts of Oak has a report here. And, over at The Conservative Woman, the indefatigable Kathy Gyngell writes:
There is little doubt in my view, that Ofcom had decided to bare its teeth against GB News and Mark Steyn, its foremost broadcaster and the first and only one to challenge the official covid narrative on air. The tragedy, as I have said time and again, is that in a misjudgment of significant proportions for itself, GB News hung Mark out to dry instead of making this a test case against the arbitrary powers the Government delegated to Ofcom in 2003. These are powers it has blatantly abused; powers which allowed it not just to write its own broadcasting code but to interpret it as it likes and later also to monitor for 'covid misinformation'. As both judge and jury it has the ability to make up rules as it goes along and the right to apply them unilaterally. A tribunal with total powers, you could say.
Actually, it's worse than that. Ofcom are not just "both judge and jury" but also prosecutor - indeed, to put it in Keir Starmer terms, they are judge, jury and Director of Public Prosecutions. All justice systems have an element of "selective prosecutions", but, when it's as "selective" as Ofcom, that's corrupt. Four complaints about my April 2022 show were enough to launch an "investigation" - whereas celebrity doctors on the take from Pfizer and AstraZeneca ballyhooing the jabs as "100 per cent" safe and effective attract no such inquiries.
Even in Canada, as I discovered seventeen years back, the feds and almost all provinces separate their thought-crime enforcers into a "human rights" commission (the prosecution) and a "human rights" tribunal (the adjudication). The regime Blair created (and that Cameron, May, Johnson, Sunak and GB News backed) merged these functions. If, with respect to Farage's participation in political debates, Ofcom gives the impression of being able to do whatever they want, that's because (after a decade and a half of fake-o Conservatives) they can.
end
if you could add the below. anons would be very grateful.
this applies around the world.
>>21059352, >>21059356 regulating the will of the people - mark steyn on Quango's (ofcom, why farage was not allowed on the leaders debate in the u.k)
dubs