>>21062558
2ND AMENDNMENT SCOTUS DECISION
THE UNITED STATES V'S RAHMI CASE COULD BE USED TO REMOVE GUNS FROM THOSE DEAMED A THREAT BY THE SUPREME COURT !!!
Note: After research and the link below, justice roberts delivered the opinion.
103 page pdf.
rahmi is a piece of shit and he should have had his gun rights removed according to this case alone, but it should not be used as a blanket rule. It does not state this is a universal rule to remove guns, but how corrupt the fbi and doj is, of course it is still a danger.
from first impressions, anon is not a lawyer but has watched a lot of robert gouveia to learn how to scan court transcripts and find relevant important.
NEED LAWFAGS TO CONFIRM
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf
===
BREAKING.๐จ
The Supreme Court issues a ruling that the Second Amendment does not imply an "unlimited right" to bear arms in a case that impacts the felony conviction of Hunter Biden.
"Held: When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment."
"Since the Founding, the Nationโs firearm laws have included regulations to stop individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms."
"The right to keep and bear arms is among the 'fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty'."
"That right, however, 'is not unlimited'." [โฆ]
"Together, the surety and going armed laws confirm what common sense suggests: When an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed."