>>2106596

Who would cover it?

>>2106616

We're one of a few channels trying to get information out there around the gatekeepers.

I don't know how I feel about the speaker. Seems a little smooth/rehearsed

>>2106685

>>2106690

Am I understanding correctly that the witness is not appearing live, but over the phone?

Here we go, witness on the phone!

Witness is going by "Luke." Audio only via speaker phone. Distorted voice. He is now explaining his military and intelligence background (suspicious?) before going into his eye-witness account.

"I do not know Seth Rich. Never met him, never dealt with him. Never heard the name until these people were bragging about what they had done."

>>2106744

"Three people that night had been surveilling him because of the computer breach."

"they knew what he'd done."

Witness confirms one culprit was DEA and one was ETF. Is apparently NOT GIVING NAMES.

"they knew he had this thumb drive that he wanted."

"according to them he always kept [the thumb drive] on him"

>>2106794

Every dog has his day.

What motive does witness have to conceal identities? He is disguised.

I am also getting BS vibes from this conference.

"There have been rumors that it was MS-13. It wasn't."

"There was a Russian tie-in."

Okay, officially calling it. FF.

"not information, it was information control." Suggesting wikileaks somehow altered to frame dems?

"Debunks" MS-13, despite not actually naming witnesses.

Ties in Russia.

Blames Republicans.

This is deep state.

>>2106888

GOOD point.

First reporter "you could be any guy. Jack could have put you up to this. Shat's the evidence?"

Am I understanding correctly that one of his major points of evidence is that he "took a lie detector test." Which the public has no access to, since witness in anon, and are also easy to manipulate.

Witness confirms he works/worked in intelligence. Red Flag!

Question to witness: "Why would you talk to media and not police?"

I like the skeptical questions.

>>2106951

Wait, so did the Russian government hack the DNC or kill the leaker? Why would they do both?

EVERYTHING CAN'T BE RUSSIA.

>>2106991

When you hit "CTRL F" it opens up a search function for the page. That's where you type.

To Recap Why This SR Presser is Suspicious

-Witness is ex-intelligence agency

-Witness refuses to name witnesses

-Witness claims perps just bragged openly about crime.

-Witness claimed SR had thumb drive on him the night he was murdered…how'd it get to WL then?

-Witness explicitly says it was NOT MS-13

-Witness blames Republicans (although leak benefits them? What's motive?)

-Witness claim Russian tie in (although leak would benefit them? Why would Russians be both behind the leak and the murder?

-Witness says evidence is he passed a lie detector test.

-WITNESS JUST EXPLICITLY SAID "QANON IS NOT CORRECT"

This is a Q damage control psy-op.

>>2107075

WITNESS JUST EXPLICITLY STATED "QANON IS NOT CORRECT

Witness just said "he died on his knees." Didn't SR die at the hospital?

>>2107153

Sorry for fucked up formatting.

WITNESS SAID SR DIED ON HIS KNEES

DIDN'T SR DIE IN THE HOSPTIAL?

Am I missing something? Witness seems to believe SR was shot and killed on the street?