you are FOS
your final conclusion about blame was the FOS part, anon
>>21081317
you don't seem to now what a precipice is.
one doesn't ascend on.
one finds one along the trail.
you might ascend TO a precipice but you'd need ropes and climbing gear to climb up a cliff and reach it.
the precipice is the place at the top.
there is no more ascending beyond that usually.
I suppose ti could be a precipice along a mountainside and there could be more ascending.
but the precipice itself isn't a path or a trail, or even a climb.
It's a place along the edge of a cliff or abyss where there is a large drop.
>>21081482
sorry, anon. I do know what it is.
you are gaslighting now.
you posted this over and over and over.
are you doing it again because you are conflict mongering again?
you ignore that they counted him as one but he wasn't one.
why do you ignore that part?
because you take scripture and try to start fights with it.
and by their fruit you will know them.
one who uses scripture to start fights is clearly not using scripture as intended.
and now you're doing the 'inquistor' bit.
who says it bothers me.
I'm pointing out that you have a well known 'bit'.
you pretend to be about the Jesus story but really you just learned enough to use it to gaslight and try and start conflicts.