Iwo Jima
Mount Suribachi
Is the Q-Clock too complex?
Pretty sure I am not an enemy.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1805491149383012807
"Former Republican state Sen. Ray Holmberg, 80, of Grand Forks, signed the plea agreement last week. It was filed Monday. He agreed to plead guilty to travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual activity."
https://apnews.com/article/ray-holmberg-north-dakota-9f83dfaa38a92e5833ae046e15b0a2d3
How I figured out how to use the q-clock is the following:
find the current date( 6/25/2024 on :52)
draw a [15] minute delta around the clock( :07, :22, and :37)
read all the drops on those lines and count all the [markers]. Single letters in [ ], numbers in [ ] and any timestamps in [ ]. So far all the double letters in [ ] has not proved of any use for that, but have pointed to names in the news.
after counting all the [markers], I take note the amount of each. If there is an odd amount of [4]s and [d]s for example, that would mean going back [4] from the [15] daily delta. Ann even amount would mean going ahead [4] of the daily delta.
look at the timestamp of tweets and truths from various accounts and see what is mentioned in the tweets and truths
There is a solution. Nobody applies it.
We are likely looking at different issues.
Can't use the Clock as a prediction tool.
Read it yourself. All you need to be able to do is:
-Follow straight lines.
-Count to 60
-Know what numbers are odd and which are even.
It is time consuming, but not hard.
I only use that for the vanilla blank clock.
Use the [15] delta. No drops support the method advertised by the Paytriots running that sight.
Currently only to 7/3/2024. They add another 60 day loop after that.
https://www.q-clock.com/images/qclock_vanilla.jpg
Many drops are missing. Always double check.
Debunk it then. Prove me wrong.
Ok…
:52, :07, :22, and :37.