>The water is FLAT against the glass.
It is in fact not.
(pic inversely related)
Due to surface tension the water will rise up the sides of the beaker creating a curved surface.
>The water is FLAT against the glass.
It is in fact not.
(pic inversely related)
Due to surface tension the water will rise up the sides of the beaker creating a curved surface.
>Gravity is just a theory,
I science a 'Theory' is the highest status a concept can have.
It's not like in common speech where 'theory' just means a hunch.
In science for a concept to rise to the level of theory it has to have been rigorously tested and independently verified.
Human consciousness is just a theoryโฆ
>Theory of man caused climate change destroys your puny postulate.
Scientism is not Science.
The field is corrupt as fuck today.
However, "Man made climate change" is no where close to the level of 'Theory'.
It's a flimsy hypothesis at best.
>Does Evolution deserve scientific high distinction of "theory"?
Yes, It's an observed fact.
Let me guess, you're a creationist?
If I'm right, why can't you believe that God created the onset and his flawless creation was able to perfect itself through evolution and natural selection?
That's what a good programmer would do rather than design each thing individually.
Nothing is perfect forever, adaption is perfection.