Anonymous ID: 548101 June 25, 2024, 3:09 a.m. No.21083264   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3267

Ausfag here. Y'know who's all amped about Assange?… my lefty friends and family. Confirms my view that he's not on our side. Spooks gonna spook. A dangerous game as he found out.

Anonymous ID: 548101 June 25, 2024, 4:04 a.m. No.21083344   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3362 >>3395 >>3399

You could make an argument that, as a journalist, Assange had the right to drop anything and everything and that any freedom-loving patriot should defend that right.

Sure.

I would prefer if the things journalists said were true. Like I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch defending Brian Stelter. The problem for me is, if JA is a spy masquerading as a journalist, what fuckery have we had our little heads caught up in?

Take Podesta and pizzagate. Anons have spent billions of combined hours working through, understanding, speculating, accusing, blogging about, seeking justice for etc based on the things JA dropped. Nothing ever came of it. Was it a psyop?

What about HRC servers. Nothing ever came of that either. Long story short, I'm skeptical of JA. I could be wrong of course. Maybe he's a good guy. My gut tells me he's not. Just spitballin' here. What say you, anons?

Anonymous ID: 548101 June 25, 2024, 4:19 a.m. No.21083372   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3393 >>3466

>>21083362

>JA is an 'journalist'/'actor'/'operative', I think for "Good".

>I think the evidence you talk of is being saved to use at an opportune time, maybe before the election, but certainly you would want it to be used after the election.

>The evidence is as thick as the grass.

Thanks for the reply, anon.

What's your thinking on why the Bidan DOJ would release him now?