Anonymous ID: 5ea302 June 25, 2024, 6:17 p.m. No.21087429   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7465

>>21087332

That was just another dime a dozen reeeeeee that usually happens when facts contradict a set of faiths and convictions built on lies.

It's science. Google "Most Recent Common Ancestor".

You and I and everyone alive are of the same genetic lineage.

>you are definitely jewish

You're jewish by lineage, because jewish lineage lineage is everyone's lineage and everyone's lineage is everyone else's lineage.

You don't even know what you really mean when you write jew, do you.

When exactly, with which person, did "jews" begin, and why wasn't their parents jewish lineage?

The word you're using has no genetic meaning.

Truth is that there is no lineage that divides humanity.

We're all related to the same ancestral mother. Do your research, better than reeeeeing.

>>21087364

Muhjoo shill tactic, falsely attribute quote to an author, and falsely claim that the word jew is a smear.

You're genetically of the same lineage as everyone else.

What you're claiming to be dividing from humanity, is a projection of your own self-alienation.

 

None of you have provided better ideas. I mean, if what I said is so wrong, surely it would be easy to deboonk it.

But you won't, because you can't.

kek

Say hi to your mother and father who are also of the same bloodline as jews and everyone else.

Your dna is objective.

Anonymous ID: 5ea302 June 25, 2024, 6:27 p.m. No.21087500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7525 >>7541

>>21087465

You can assign any reference variable name to any anon you want any time you want. It has no bearing on the truth that we are all genetically descended from the same ancestors.

 

muhjoo shilling is like a person in the bottom row, believing themselves divided from another person in the bottom row, using nothing but an act of assigning a reference variable name to them, and then claiming that there is something wrong with that person's bloodline.

The accuser's own bloodline is the same bloodline as the accused.

 

You're not anti-science are you?